From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25E3D30B514; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 23:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761349969; cv=none; b=rtoa6gyLg0L8xAuV4Oz8YAfNvonkDERuoE/D7FZlR6T0BWOdND3mpn2kIulOi1pB/dpxybDTa0hIR4g+RPHZGcMxGMwkr91QbzOyqbaDLyn0KqAtfMBugZdWgmO3Lqx/FcqhoZBCVIKvVZMpwy2FO6M/U5bCcWBcca06nHgwwig= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761349969; c=relaxed/simple; bh=b0jfHYj44WW3Zp+PPuXiv/hESxuovunxR5Sto+KsZP8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=J3FzNb1ucG97+WJIl4rs2x/LTzspE0y6i4PsnHsft/Pzo4uTVmFLeRLQw7+SGhehdtrE+Mpuo5ZN3bL65QUQ8RK5gCWfx4Q7BI0/LFkRjvdQEkR6FmTxAmJnKWf/dN7pDAKQb19yndWWTjt8dkz/nV797ABUKomrofxd8dzIHdY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=B66In4xN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="B66In4xN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3827AC4CEF1; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 23:52:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761349969; bh=b0jfHYj44WW3Zp+PPuXiv/hESxuovunxR5Sto+KsZP8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=B66In4xNCNxVEDQGPF8TPmdcO39k0bqwoxFirR2qqcGP05m9QpA8T+NoWo0XO4ppM tTwWLWDqeCSudvqHzVtXygwe7c9d0NxMbTwW2KzwJSJ9ySzFXjAVL7MSy/cd8zpz3t eJGeaFzaEwJKyGGiDSE0nOzPrRQLE+G6IuAqmyf45ycjXD95HubYAOcrXvm4DXocmV ZCEHtqQyQc1xTy0mcqzDYdlQPetyOmmHxZeHArhWGS8m0dMqYaMf0KYBkBPqkZiugG n+qC5RCRrFL9Z2sYkqbPA/GWZlmkwJY3HhUqo7kdpS4dWWtmNDNl2llAWZwkDyrzpZ dH85M0c66uWUg== Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 16:52:47 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: =?UTF-8?B?QXNiasO4cm4=?= Sloth =?UTF-8?B?VMO4bm5lc2Vu?= Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Chia-Yu Chang , Chuck Lever , Donald Hunter , Jonathan Corbet , "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" , Simon Horman , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Zahari Doychev Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] ynl: add ignore-index flag for indexed-array Message-ID: <20251024165247.5494ea93@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20251022182701.250897-1-ast@fiberby.net> <20251022184517.55b95744@kernel.org> <20251023170342.2bb7ce83@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 19:19:10 +0000 Asbj=C3=B8rn Sloth T=C3=B8nnesen wrote: > Do we wanna do the same for sub-type nest in the python client? > as the WG/Jason bandwidth seams pretty limited atm. Please focus on what's needed to get WG implemented. My "bandwidth" for pondering cleanups that may not matter in practice=20 is also limited. Main goal for YNL is new families. Polishing the old stuff is a huge time sink.