From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C49B91A5B92 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 01:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761787905; cv=none; b=GLCEIR5At/doROp2iZhpIZGG3QrHq6BJTag0h1PcpMjTez+HNiZ7JAsGDgB/IwC3Ei2YBmdDrlVV3woIo8dqImD/gLrSRjwLl1sk9gv0t1VPuyHXZydlSOjOmHtG8KxZUO8J+gOvVySuTqVqF9U3LIUu5gTJqZ2Wj2vTevHEacM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761787905; c=relaxed/simple; bh=05p+UU6f865M9AorNZxNqh9P/Bx8uoBhGYh4apd4QFk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=P9YAB85oub7Y/mpl/OhgSEDzKjZYWEEndPJtsyXRv74sIc+rRTOZywjbrsTkmK0QjHvr2CdCLABlNvOOPquQoUzRAaIus/SuPYztqPme9cUoYeIOJXmfszNDoKtDpofXwgacXeSGZOwaUBWuv3ITf+iZfBlzSJpToUOqEalH9S8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=gsxxGF3Q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gsxxGF3Q" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9106C4CEF7; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 01:31:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761787905; bh=05p+UU6f865M9AorNZxNqh9P/Bx8uoBhGYh4apd4QFk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gsxxGF3Qr2vLxmjtAQhM6KNH+Nux1X5rC0tUdFNPjbPRcz3BhmH1YyCs1QFjbjKHv K5HmJieT2RyOUr0iOusJaVFIDfiO3Hr5PWxdIOLGcTK6PIZ0neKDWpGnaZhcJQ/j6d uv4ENVOvRv4ryytC8H37/yQKejiaO4H+NMRa44Lv3MNnllcuXY27wNcgTEa52/+mo4 mJIi5azfui3Eiy/zltvQPfJ3tJpKuzRaqcvZOcNJspLVMExqMwYk+sA4ebSHKSux92 FOm27g4Leh7wD3TKu+k+2HZ1W/CsfAuidVVaprZvOB6tDxiOD9nuX7q2dqssawbUkk Ile0CO5/J3apg== Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 18:31:43 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Ido Schimmel Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, horms@kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org, petrm@nvidia.com, willemb@google.com, daniel@iogearbox.net, fw@strlen.de, ishaangandhi@gmail.com, rbonica@juniper.net, tom@herbertland.com, Justin Iurman Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] icmp: Add RFC 5837 support Message-ID: <20251029183143.09afd245@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20251027082232.232571-1-idosch@nvidia.com> <20251028180432.7f73ef56@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 11:54:43 +0200 Ido Schimmel wrote: > > Is there supposed to be any relation between the ICMP message attrs > > and what's provided via IOAM? For interface ID in IOAM we have > > the ioam6_id attr instead of ifindex. > > RFC 5837 precedes IOAM and I don't see any references from IOAM to RFC > 5837. RFC 5837 is pretty clear about the interface index that should be > provided: > > "The ifIndex of the interface of interest MAY be included. This is the > 32-bit ifIndex assigned to the interface by the device as specified by > the Interfaces Group MIB [RFC2863]". Makes sense, thanks. And we have another 4 weeks to change our mind, in case someone from IETF pipes up..