From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Buday Csaba <buday.csaba@prolan.hu>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: ethernet-phy: clarify when compatible must specify PHY ID
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 15:08:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251031-smartness-cattishly-465de28ec20b@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f08d956b-4392-41c0-93d7-d7dd105c016c@lunn.ch>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2593 bytes --]
On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 02:01:26PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 09:15:06AM +0100, Buday Csaba wrote:
> > Change PHY ID description in ethernet-phy.yaml to clarify that a
> > PHY ID is required (may -> must) when the PHY requires special
> > initialization sequence.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20251026212026.GA2959311-robh@kernel.org/
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/aQIZvDt5gooZSTcp@debianbuilder/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Buday Csaba <buday.csaba@prolan.hu>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml
> > index 2ec2d9fda..6f5599902 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml
> > @@ -35,9 +35,10 @@ properties:
> > description: PHYs that implement IEEE802.3 clause 45
> > - pattern: "^ethernet-phy-id[a-f0-9]{4}\\.[a-f0-9]{4}$"
> > description:
> > - If the PHY reports an incorrect ID (or none at all) then the
> > - compatible list may contain an entry with the correct PHY ID
> > - in the above form.
> > + If the PHY reports an incorrect ID (or none at all), or the PHY
> > + requires a specific initialization sequence (like a particular
> > + order of clocks, resets, power supplies), then the compatible list
> > + must contain an entry with the correct PHY ID in the above form.
>
> That is good start, but how about:
>
> PHYs contain identification registers. These will be read to
> identify the PHY. If the PHY reports an incorrect ID, or the
> PHY requires a specific initialization sequence (like a
> particular order of clocks, resets, power supplies), in
> order to be able to read the ID registers, then the
> compatible list must contain an entry with the correct PHY
> ID in the above form.
>
> The first two sentences make it clear we ideally use the ID registers.
> Then we say what happens if cannot work.
>
> The "(or none at all)" is exactly the case you are trying to clarify,
> it does not respond due to missing reset, clocks etc. We don't need to
> say it twice, so i removed it.
I like this wording,
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
pw-bot: changes-requested
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-31 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-31 8:15 [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: ethernet-phy: clarify when compatible must specify PHY ID Buday Csaba
2025-10-31 13:01 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-10-31 15:08 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2025-11-03 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Buday Csaba
2025-11-03 13:19 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-11-03 16:49 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-11-05 1:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251031-smartness-cattishly-465de28ec20b@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=buday.csaba@prolan.hu \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox