From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 947511898F8 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 18:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761935922; cv=none; b=IEL9zPCYHFX+hwTvuNfS2OB1R84e6+2yEjQrfjKHV78fvXTvCv+pJAywSpOlZlEjP9lGQQgGopHSRiopHzvBNyKNrXdgTEmYJdyxyu538yggQi4UHVM+DprjAkZ1p+Fh+s5tTyH2YSd/W3Nw37WiU62P8C5h/GGOvPeJ87G4yxc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761935922; c=relaxed/simple; bh=15E5ci1sKkWmYweiaVDjg/8xeqjQIU5DkH66QuBZWaQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ayShTcLqksqSQEXwo22TdAm1wxL8R9Rj6pvWeNYxAcwx+3Gvwwg5F65HjvvoAVsYgY8dA1b8RjG6GoM6nMyhAme4MueyfssX0q4rnN7H73REMfMkR7KYMyilno2z7hpfzRpF+ZfiZHw+wYKDEefTLgypVnMzIz/7nyeMZ5ZSEHU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=qj+gzO9z; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qj+gzO9z" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75A25C4CEE7; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 18:38:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761935922; bh=15E5ci1sKkWmYweiaVDjg/8xeqjQIU5DkH66QuBZWaQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qj+gzO9znW5xDDYE74Di489ySXv22EKDscNMyfXckAJeuDq2I1lWEZCIzkhy4u9TS Fy1ubpPoCbQELwfgIComEQhr8vKl44DP9UVhPT3l29z4DN3J+9Y+qI7yvtkMI5lTW+ +Lf/LTd/BIPOVEO9hFRDCYW1GXcAlTFHmg3HP3Ap9NM2kurmqcnmcsyKg7V8kqN3px ZXOJ732KRrHPq+dsqd+9MoK+bvlDQkvnNrXa3rKP7j/rgwPlFsvCuFXbAUz8Ada6Qp 53kd+Zia3t1rEsQ+S4bl2DEAoHEMQnztW5lAjvVO2lEgtSU6531+GMwR7RFq+vbdRa iRtR+ZsZJegTg== Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 11:38:40 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Kory Maincent Cc: Vadim Fedorenko , Sudarsana Kalluru , Manish Chopra , Marco Crivellari , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Sunil Goutham , Richard Cochran , Russell King , Vladimir Oltean , Simon Horman , Jacob Keller , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/7] net: pch_gbe: convert to use ndo_hwtstamp callbacks Message-ID: <20251031113840.067ef711@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20251031183525.5b8b8110@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> References: <20251031004607.1983544-1-vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev> <20251031004607.1983544-7-vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev> <20251031183525.5b8b8110@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 18:35:25 +0100 Kory Maincent wrote: > > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_SYNC: > > - adapter->hwts_rx_en = 0; > > + adapter->hwts_rx_en = cfg->rx_filter; > > It seems there is a functional change here. > > > pch_ch_control_write(pdev, SLAVE_MODE | CAP_MODE0); Good catch. Looks like SLAVE | MODE0 translates to 0 | 0 so presumably the device doesn't actually support timestamping of V1 L4 SYNC messages? Unclear what to do about this. Maybe let's leave it be? keep the hwts_rx_en = 0; ? Not strictly correct but at least we won't break anything.