netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Cc: Wang Liang <wangliang74@huawei.com>,
	andrew@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yuehaibing@huawei.com,
	zhangchangzhong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: netdevsim: Fix ethtool-features.sh fail
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 16:51:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251104165121.7069ad66@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aQnd1HQ-b7wFI2WP@krikkit>

On Tue, 4 Nov 2025 12:04:52 +0100 Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> So I guess you would lean toward not accepting any such patch, not
> requiring new tests to have SKIP checks, but leaving any existing
> checks in?

Yes, IOW leave it at the discretion of the test author.

> (and I suspect removing all the existing ones wouldn't
> actually reduce the flow of "add check for too old $tool" patches, so
> it probably doesn't make sense to do that)


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-05  0:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-30  3:22 [PATCH net] selftests: netdevsim: Fix ethtool-features.sh fail Wang Liang
2025-10-30 23:13 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-10-31  0:02   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-03 10:13     ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-11-03 13:36       ` Andrew Lunn
2025-11-03 15:01         ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-11-03 15:31           ` Andrew Lunn
2025-11-04  0:01       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-04 11:04         ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-11-05  0:51           ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-11-03  8:58   ` Wang Liang
2025-11-03  9:59     ` Sabrina Dubroca

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251104165121.7069ad66@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=wangliang74@huawei.com \
    --cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangchangzhong@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).