From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 662629463 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 02:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762309921; cv=none; b=H5vdevy1aL6GbjWPd8bsE1ou+QWtFFJQPRElBVAorQscElz+Q5uqQ6YQSZFGIlQi3gk2bwdJebV5mDYLlx8IYrSNw6oPjS5O3LNxM8NUElIi8ndI8xdoVfmKcRp7zHm5UnE3s0hgHd862Uqc8blIEE2tDgZEKwsRtCf5Hr/cpZo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762309921; c=relaxed/simple; bh=N66lmHQ41ZDXetSBgvIvh3usb9oXxS7iym9uIs0RMFM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pU+Q801+AmADRE6l8GZYSAINvAVAJ6snyS/AhCg42uR5UKoh6+yAOXa9HoqL7is1w5hiKmUYMouaaQEW3xNDzLPtD4GG4shOJkN3TSVpONkBNnX52LQq60XkYS3oK4oha+g76B9YhVRGfOcDJX2J4IE+7H/yzpxDSmcww5LGWoM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=f52iJApX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="f52iJApX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7009C4CEF7; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 02:32:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1762309921; bh=N66lmHQ41ZDXetSBgvIvh3usb9oXxS7iym9uIs0RMFM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=f52iJApXniSnJG23KU5Oz+PgjvuiRtr+krHr/tt3GTouhQj548TRkgfRflFebtszu LhNWS9yekrzDAqRuxdjntOyeR560iDOI/X5MAMpjNO38HOiB+dXiDlWelGWfWIHRkd 5ObftU5iDrmvL1Z/i6zUGpEJbigiNjVMUZaxTvQlXHmZ/rXIg/MC+oJpqN34AVgG+A p8pOtPmfsGzFHOhSrB4pAADf5Qmc2ZSBvph1JnaWxj+eDQEP+EpJRG04ZezurbfCpA k8oiKnnpqT6/19f/KpfKt35hnV1J/JQwk3UNisk/lkaVXxCdTdUhYA/XPagWtYOkLG rj7T4yKvb//QQ== Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 18:32:00 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Lorenzo Bianconi Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: airoha: Reorganize airoha_queue struct Message-ID: <20251104183200.41b4b853@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20251103-airoha-tx-linked-list-v1-2-baa07982cc30@kernel.org> References: <20251103-airoha-tx-linked-list-v1-0-baa07982cc30@kernel.org> <20251103-airoha-tx-linked-list-v1-2-baa07982cc30@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 03 Nov 2025 11:27:56 +0100 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > Do not allocate memory for rx-only fields for hw tx queues and for tx-only > fields for hw rx queues. Could you share more details (pahole) Given that napi_struct is in the same struct, 20B is probably not going to make much difference?