netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	razor@blackwall.org, pabeni@redhat.com, willemb@google.com,
	sdf@fomichev.me, john.fastabend@gmail.com, martin.lau@kernel.org,
	jordan@jrife.io, maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com,
	magnus.karlsson@intel.com, dw@davidwei.uk, toke@redhat.com,
	yangzhenze@bytedance.com, wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 11/14] netkit: Implement rtnl_link_ops->alloc and ndo_queue_create
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 07:54:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251107075430.6a4f32ff@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12551093-9384-4801-b2d1-a5505a87f9b4@iogearbox.net>

On Fri, 7 Nov 2025 16:01:44 +0100 Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 11/7/25 1:41 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 22:21:00 +0100 Daniel Borkmann wrote:  
> >> +static void netkit_get_channels(struct net_device *dev,
> >> +				struct ethtool_channels *channels)
> >> +{
> >> +	channels->max_rx = dev->num_rx_queues;
> >> +	channels->max_tx = dev->num_tx_queues;
> >> +	channels->max_other = 0;
> >> +	channels->max_combined = 1;
> >> +	channels->rx_count = dev->real_num_rx_queues;
> >> +	channels->tx_count = dev->real_num_tx_queues;
> >> +	channels->other_count = 0;
> >> +	channels->combined_count = 0;
> >>   }  
> > 
> > Why do we need to implement get_channels?  
> 
> Thanks for the feedback. I think this one was useful imho since it allowed
> for introspection via ethtool on netkit side e.g. the max_rx vs rx_count.

Right, but we have netdev-nl queue-get now which also reports the new
"lease"/"peer" info so it will be much clearer.

Ah, is this because libbpf looks at channels to figure out the queue
count? Can we make it use netdev-nl ?

I guess it could also count the entries in $sysfs/queues/rx-* but that
doesn't express the fact that queue 0 is unusable. Which I suppose the
get_channels implementation was trying to "express" by setting
max_combined=1 ? 😶️

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-07 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-31 21:20 [PATCH net-next v4 00/14] netkit: Support for io_uring zero-copy and AF_XDP Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 01/14] net: Add bind-queue operation Daniel Borkmann
2025-11-07  0:39   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-19 14:57     ` Daniel Borkmann
2025-11-20  2:20       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 02/14] net: Implement netdev_nl_bind_queue_doit Daniel Borkmann
2025-11-07  0:39   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 03/14] net: Add peer info to queue-get response Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 04/14] net, ethtool: Disallow peered real rxqs to be resized Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 05/14] net: Proxy net_mp_{open,close}_rxq for mapped queues Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 06/14] xsk: Move NETDEV_XDP_ACT_ZC into generic header Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 07/14] xsk: Extend xsk_rcv_check validation Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 08/14] xsk: Proxy pool management for mapped queues Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 09/14] netkit: Add single device mode for netkit Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 10/14] netkit: Document fast vs slowpath members via macros Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 11/14] netkit: Implement rtnl_link_ops->alloc and ndo_queue_create Daniel Borkmann
2025-11-07  0:41   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-07 15:01     ` Daniel Borkmann
2025-11-07 15:54       ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-10-31 21:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 12/14] netkit: Add netkit notifier to check for unregistering devices Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 13/14] netkit: Add io_uring zero-copy support for TCP Daniel Borkmann
2025-11-07  0:43   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-31 21:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 14/14] netkit: Add xsk support for af_xdp applications Daniel Borkmann
2025-11-04 23:22 ` [PATCH net-next v4 00/14] netkit: Support for io_uring zero-copy and AF_XDP Stanislav Fomichev
2025-11-05  0:43   ` David Wei
2025-11-05 19:51     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-11-08 22:18       ` David Wei
2025-11-07  0:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-07  1:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251107075430.6a4f32ff@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jordan@jrife.io \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=yangzhenze@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).