From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7016FEEB3; Tue, 18 Nov 2025 01:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763427913; cv=none; b=HCzSckMOTYs1nzzCofmi86RI5rwH2X4S1Kf+16Y6Q9nXZDIfpK+fXDZneRcHtDSVk9c9DQlnWnJatS9/U6P6Go5Klvij6UJVtTG3cCWnwnoJWYKTcmveQVISmIrg4+4c1gfpAsuLlfFo7a2zp7nDZyd8JRrgsQ6HNmZxA+dqPUo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763427913; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3vRuS3jhAbIJ4aR5KD9+0crFujpy8R3Ml2SGNf0hWQg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ulLhDfqYbhObmSwk5xGBOHibEoD11Hq66oj0ejc5M+ghKeabPvfRyKJAX8qiIkRlTnJrKziVmC6N4kwAqfLaZOb+yNojYdYRzsNB9ifO50NMegBJVQU3ruEh3d6Ndiw7rozIibrR5zDrSOo33MdDElfYRztSBdxCBD6jHaV0s6M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=th3Aa8oY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="th3Aa8oY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D195BC4CEF1; Tue, 18 Nov 2025 01:05:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1763427911; bh=3vRuS3jhAbIJ4aR5KD9+0crFujpy8R3Ml2SGNf0hWQg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=th3Aa8oY2cXQ3JWEy4XJSXlFX10rgFvafqnnSXmZo9kDCKUjuHXF9Iay0nbQURsiQ sd0PkY6u6uT7AoVJql4BvJWGY5aQP5PGnOfkCe9dMiIqpfKJ9GSYhlN646/StMkJ0l 1gWfUAICr0RsvSKnONMEjQ+SPdSAncWQi8yq1KlkMoXeIptfw5PTSxsAkdhFfKmus2 70THQqjA9YFvaUEEoXsSHajPt8tcoAS+FkzgcM7fhX+EVd3DFKml6nFF/NiMqCYCqS dwCqt0UG8CIlkPs29FiCFwWvsMuVxGqdvdSA1R3i94PTnDFHZInbmBu06PMc1NWRnh w1AdKfv8WNsuA== Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 17:05:08 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Matthieu Baerts Cc: Eric Dumazet , Mat Martineau , Geliang Tang , Florian Westphal , netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, syzbot+2a6fbf0f0530375968df@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Geliang Tang , MPTCP Linux , "David S . Miller" , Paolo Abeni Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] mptcp: fix a race in mptcp_pm_del_add_timer() Message-ID: <20251117170508.4ffe043f@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20251117100745.1913963-1-edumazet@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 17 Nov 2025 11:42:31 +0100 Matthieu Baerts wrote: > >> Out of curiosity, is it not OK to reply to the patch with the new > >> Reported-by & Closes tags to have them automatically added when applying > >> the patch? (I was going to do that on the v1, then I saw the v2 just > >> when I was going to press 'Send' :) ) > > > > I am not sure patchwork has been finally changed to understand these two tags. > > Ah yes, thank you! If there is a dependence on Patchwork, I think > indeed, it doesn't recognise the 'Closes' tag (but I think 'Reported-by' > is OK). > > While at it, I forgot to add: this patch can be applied in net directly. FWIW I have a local script which extracts them from patchwork comments and applies them (same for Fixes tags). But it's always safer to resend.