From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D549B2DF6EA; Tue, 18 Nov 2025 18:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763491852; cv=none; b=Lng2G1ahi4F6on7GpcATd4az5JCx/Y7xtLCuSQ5DVucu3VyHpdoSdhzRXFHV9osltMkZLyeRegJ4pXkvm/fMr1YLyNpFL3JltcFn40wcyf4qkruLJYxPvpEk4xJ9XY+0DDf4UB5o0OAhO0NzRKx8cfrp1+eZ1TVic4QwPBJ6uHg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763491852; c=relaxed/simple; bh=izTWAaIRwfEhA3shFOFsm6xfo2cpycmkBR78fGnKC5A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=eJI6Stehj1nbNW2Sht0GW3uvhiQQAQEjzExnpc7ufeIX6YGHTCE6tGfYn4EvCZexPfeivaMHsnSvs2Wxt5Gi6/OZEYAu3WkaJg0s7NveexQei1GKTmpx82aeuKj+DWVTtx6SnIrSAax0z+rmeCqdNrqkLLtt90fCfTqmYKdW8w8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=mgxkgHY1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mgxkgHY1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B673C2BCF5; Tue, 18 Nov 2025 18:50:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1763491851; bh=izTWAaIRwfEhA3shFOFsm6xfo2cpycmkBR78fGnKC5A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mgxkgHY1vB06Vs+5qLR2BohSyTtvXGgerZ2Vd2d5LNcbSCcDkcCu/1/1UxUarQJ3y gIQ2SiiQcsMoukVfHab53sOhiz+rCSU+lPrYFbQZap3hygc9pC2ilsCLL55QYCC3Nq XK6WQgIAu94b3+hx9AipIrFxFxG0Jd/b1YuqQkiejIWC6ohG9z1J/kFG8R9D8GWEbK T4xX0TVovRAYj8RlkHaGe3nwEvJ5rxdXqkNVf7/Q7hVSS1uU2839uJW+SIwIpHocu2 aryOO9she8I3SwNYDPojNOBijqrfvEK1QpnjiK0ZsxLY81lFD9QOn/DyccDWoPDJYa ES2l4zydZ/qwg== Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 10:50:47 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: I Viswanath Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, eperezma@redhat.com, sdf@fomichev.me, kuniyu@google.com, skhawaja@google.com, aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFT net-next v4 0/2] net: Split ndo_set_rx_mode into snapshot and deferred write Message-ID: <20251118105047.20788ed9@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20251118164333.24842-1-viswanathiyyappan@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 22:26:42 +0530 I Viswanath wrote: > I am sorry that it is broken. I will submit a v5 as soon as possible Broken as in patch titles or broken as in it crashes the kernel? Both are true. Just to be safe "as soon as possible" hopefully takes into account our "no reposts within 24h" rule. https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html Also I'm not sure what you mean by RFT, doubt anyone will test this for you, and you're modifying virtio which you should be able to test yourself.. RFC or PATCH is the choice.