netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: jiefeng.z.zhang@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, edumazet@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, irusskikh@marvell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: atlantic: fix fragment overflow handling in RX path
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 12:24:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251118122430.65cc5738@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251118070402.56150-1-jiefeng.z.zhang@gmail.com>

On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 15:04:02 +0800 jiefeng.z.zhang@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Jiefeng Zhang <jiefeng.z.zhang@gmail.com>
> 
> The atlantic driver can receive packets with more than MAX_SKB_FRAGS (17)
> fragments when handling large multi-descriptor packets. This causes an
> out-of-bounds write in skb_add_rx_frag_netmem() leading to kernel panic.
> 
> The issue occurs because the driver doesn't check the total number of
> fragments before calling skb_add_rx_frag(). When a packet requires more
> than MAX_SKB_FRAGS fragments, the fragment index exceeds the array bounds.
> 
> Add a check in __aq_ring_rx_clean() to ensure the total number of fragments
> (including the initial header fragment and subsequent descriptor fragments)
> does not exceed MAX_SKB_FRAGS. If it does, drop the packet gracefully
> and increment the error counter.

First off, some basic Linux mailing list savoir vivre:
 - please don't top post
 - please don't resubmit your code within 24h of previous posting
 - please wait for a discussion to close before you send another version

Quoting your response:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/CADEc0q6iLdpwYsyGAwH4qzST8G7asjdqgR6+ymXMy1k0wRwhNQ@mail.gmail.com/

> I have used git send-email to send my code.
> 
> As for the patch --The aquantia/atlantic driver supports a maximum of
> AQ_CFG_SKB_FRAGS_MAX (32U) fragments, while the kernel limits the
> maximum number of fragments to MAX_SKB_FRAGS (17).

Frag count limits in drivers are usually for Tx not Rx.
Again, why do you think this driver can generate more frags than 17?
-- 
pw-bot: cr

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-18 20:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-18  7:04 [PATCH net] net: atlantic: fix fragment overflow handling in RX path jiefeng.z.zhang
2025-11-18 20:24 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-11-19  8:38   ` Jiefeng
2025-11-20  3:03     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-20 13:06       ` Jiefeng
2025-11-22  1:36         ` Jiefeng
2025-11-22  2:01           ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-24 14:08             ` Jiefeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251118122430.65cc5738@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=irusskikh@marvell.com \
    --cc=jiefeng.z.zhang@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).