From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D5901C5D7D; Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763513433; cv=none; b=ZsyRd393cS2MHScoSLfkqJFgZl9RmTEfoaaVmxWxnQDUgB5awy92CCvtUoVX+ZWR6euTOJ8qiCG1Ya9Xbdje+w9Ixz2x8Z+KatHixlgjmxBY4UGNuL4uTFNQy0z3ttZsOviITnArdOpS0Cog9rocePLjrZUL1d4QE/DFSMyADoc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763513433; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aDNZQ3grOmvLo0XdWNIfUDJpL88GIHWAlZqtP83f/5g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Xc5Z9s4PzI7GtMjYLpK4GLqjBa5cZ47oEFnd618AjNdu7nLSRXevYV1T1A51Cr8VE3G0YaYIivPhkdYDfUjAN7kQkAYeK1Mxhpl8sJFGgDoYe3wyyIEz6ROmOkSsCRrF8JDM1btjKk01AXdqUiaPtWJxXaTewMqYFxIasAv81rc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ERlSWBDP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ERlSWBDP" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9576CC2BCB4; Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:50:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1763513431; bh=aDNZQ3grOmvLo0XdWNIfUDJpL88GIHWAlZqtP83f/5g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ERlSWBDPFOjY1XAU3/jkzN6ZvXBXZGEhxPAG0oyRHp0rraobLHZUcXNkOGEz3e/SJ h6R2bDfOjl5HVcAZsQfNXfNGmc/Husck/1uicI8qHFirFhJvacJQxOBJn0yuu3MM+5 u9z7Rw07NFcfpfsAqPTc0apXo0lC8AJTYnbdKtOSaNKof3dtuJeQP0F5uE4GVPgx1h gSYewrnKv/zV8sP/iXVJjAVuM4DFb+Lew1hqEvw9xau+qw7FjLy8eroVWKvjtOFNJl PTA/XWSaYuInInpQOeicOnVzJRcCIwbN97NWhTe1hSeLD9Z+PW7t9lxmOdoOMqtZ9f FNlMsCzmP00eQ== Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 16:50:28 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: =?UTF-8?B?QXNiasO4cm4=?= Sloth =?UTF-8?B?VMO4bm5lc2Vu?= , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Donald Hunter , Simon Horman , Jacob Keller , Andrew Lunn , wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jordan Rife Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 04/11] netlink: specs: add specification for wireguard Message-ID: <20251118165028.4e43ee01@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20251105183223.89913-1-ast@fiberby.net> <20251105183223.89913-5-ast@fiberby.net> <9871bdc7-774d-4e35-be5f-02d45063d317@fiberby.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 23:52:30 +0100 Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 09:59:45PM +0000, Asbj=C3=B8rn Sloth T=C3=B8nnese= n wrote: > > So "c-function-prefix" or something might work better. =20 >=20 > Also fine with me. I'd just like consistent function naming, one way or > another. IIUC we're talking about the prefix for the kernel C codegen? Feels a bit like a one-off feature to me, but if we care deeply about it let's add it as a CLI param to the codegen. I don't think it's necessary to include this in the YAML spec.