netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, memxor@gmail.com, ameryhung@gmail.com,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/1] bpf: Annotate rqspinlock lock acquiring functions with __must_check
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 18:11:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202511181704.SFwhGJOb-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251117191515.2934026-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>

Hi Amery,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Amery-Hung/bpf-Annotate-rqspinlock-lock-acquiring-functions-with-__must_check/20251118-031838
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117191515.2934026-1-ameryhung%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/1] bpf: Annotate rqspinlock lock acquiring functions with __must_check
config: arm-randconfig-002-20251118 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251118/202511181704.SFwhGJOb-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 10.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251118/202511181704.SFwhGJOb-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511181704.SFwhGJOb-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from ./arch/arm/include/generated/asm/rqspinlock.h:1,
                    from kernel/locking/locktorture.c:367:
   kernel/locking/locktorture.c: In function 'torture_raw_res_spin_write_lock_irq':
>> include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h:255:48: warning: ignoring return value of '__raw_res_spin_lock_irqsave' declared with attribute 'warn_unused_result' [-Wunused-result]
     255 | #define raw_res_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) __raw_res_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, &flags)
         |                                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/locking/locktorture.c:396:2: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_res_spin_lock_irqsave'
     396 |  raw_res_spin_lock_irqsave(&rqspinlock, flags);
         |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/locking/locktorture.c: In function 'torture_raw_res_spin_write_lock':
>> kernel/locking/locktorture.c:372:2: warning: ignoring return value of 'raw_res_spin_lock' declared with attribute 'warn_unused_result' [-Wunused-result]
     372 |  raw_res_spin_lock(&rqspinlock);
         |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
   In file included from arch/arm/include/generated/asm/rqspinlock.h:1,
                    from locktorture.c:367:
   locktorture.c: In function 'torture_raw_res_spin_write_lock_irq':
>> include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h:255:48: warning: ignoring return value of '__raw_res_spin_lock_irqsave' declared with attribute 'warn_unused_result' [-Wunused-result]
     255 | #define raw_res_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) __raw_res_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, &flags)
         |                                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   locktorture.c:396:2: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_res_spin_lock_irqsave'
     396 |  raw_res_spin_lock_irqsave(&rqspinlock, flags);
         |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   locktorture.c: In function 'torture_raw_res_spin_write_lock':
   locktorture.c:372:2: warning: ignoring return value of 'raw_res_spin_lock' declared with attribute 'warn_unused_result' [-Wunused-result]
     372 |  raw_res_spin_lock(&rqspinlock);
         |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +255 include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h

   254	
 > 255	#define raw_res_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) __raw_res_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, &flags)
   256	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-18 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-17 19:15 [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/1] bpf: Annotate rqspinlock lock acquiring functions with __must_check Amery Hung
2025-11-18 10:11 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-11-18 10:12 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-18 10:16 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-11-18 10:42   ` David Laight
2025-11-20 20:12     ` Amery Hung
2025-11-20 21:27       ` David Laight
2025-11-25 23:34       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-11-26 21:52         ` Amery Hung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202511181704.SFwhGJOb-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).