From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
"Mike Christie" <michael.christie@oracle.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Stefano Garzarella" <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost: switch to arrays of feature bits
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 01:26:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251119012322-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEu28fHr7Bo5Zm4chwOj-xBmTYcHM3TfXRx8OZ3OhO8q8Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 10:03:58AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 3:45 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > The current interface where caller has to know in which 64 bit chunk
> > each bit is, is inelegant and fragile.
> > Let's simply use arrays of bits.
> > By using unroll macros text size grows only slightly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/vhost/net.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 9 ++++++---
> > drivers/vhost/test.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 10 ++++++----
> > 5 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> > index d057ea55f5ad..00d00034a97e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> > @@ -69,15 +69,15 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(experimental_zcopytx, "Enable Zero Copy TX;"
> >
> > #define VHOST_DMA_IS_DONE(len) ((__force u32)(len) >= (__force u32)VHOST_DMA_DONE_LEN)
> >
> > -static const u64 vhost_net_features[VIRTIO_FEATURES_U64S] = {
> > - VHOST_FEATURES |
> > - (1ULL << VHOST_NET_F_VIRTIO_NET_HDR) |
> > - (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF) |
> > - (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM) |
> > - (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET) |
> > - (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER),
> > - VIRTIO_BIT(VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UDP_TUNNEL_GSO) |
> > - VIRTIO_BIT(VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_UDP_TUNNEL_GSO),
> > +static const int vhost_net_features[] = {
> > + VHOST_FEATURES,
> > + VHOST_NET_F_VIRTIO_NET_HDR,
> > + VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF,
> > + VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM,
> > + VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET,
> > + VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER,
> > + VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UDP_TUNNEL_GSO,
> > + VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_UDP_TUNNEL_GSO
> > };
> >
> > enum {
> > @@ -1734,14 +1734,14 @@ static long vhost_net_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int ioctl,
> > return -EFAULT;
> > return vhost_net_set_backend(n, backend.index, backend.fd);
> > case VHOST_GET_FEATURES:
> > - features = vhost_net_features[0];
> > + features = VHOST_FEATURES_U64(vhost_net_features, 0);
> > if (copy_to_user(featurep, &features, sizeof features))
> > return -EFAULT;
> > return 0;
> > case VHOST_SET_FEATURES:
> > if (copy_from_user(&features, featurep, sizeof features))
> > return -EFAULT;
> > - if (features & ~vhost_net_features[0])
> > + if (features & ~VHOST_FEATURES_U64(vhost_net_features, 0))
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >
> > virtio_features_from_u64(all_features, features);
> > @@ -1753,9 +1753,13 @@ static long vhost_net_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int ioctl,
> > /* Copy the net features, up to the user-provided buffer size */
> > argp += sizeof(u64);
> > copied = min(count, (u64)VIRTIO_FEATURES_U64S);
> > - if (copy_to_user(argp, vhost_net_features,
> > - copied * sizeof(u64)))
> > - return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + {
> > + const DEFINE_VHOST_FEATURES_ARRAY(features, vhost_net_features);
> > +
> > + if (copy_to_user(argp, features, copied * sizeof(u64)))
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > + }
>
> Any reason to use a standalone block here?
Just so we can name the variable "features", as well as
having the declaration stand out a bit more.
> >
> > /* Zero the trailing space provided by user-space, if any */
> > if (clear_user(argp, size_mul(count - copied, sizeof(u64))))
> > @@ -1784,7 +1788,7 @@ static long vhost_net_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int ioctl,
> > }
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_FEATURES_U64S; i++)
> > - if (all_features[i] & ~vhost_net_features[i])
> > + if (all_features[i] & ~VHOST_FEATURES_U64(vhost_net_features, i))
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >
> > return vhost_net_set_features(n, all_features);
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
> > index 98e4f68f4e3c..04fcbe7efd77 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
> > @@ -197,11 +197,14 @@ enum {
> > };
> >
> > /* Note: can't set VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 yet, since that implies ANY_LAYOUT. */
> > -enum {
> > - VHOST_SCSI_FEATURES = VHOST_FEATURES | (1ULL << VIRTIO_SCSI_F_HOTPLUG) |
> > - (1ULL << VIRTIO_SCSI_F_T10_PI)
> > +static const int vhost_scsi_features[] = {
> > + VHOST_FEATURES,
> > + VIRTIO_SCSI_F_HOTPLUG,
> > + VIRTIO_SCSI_F_T10_PI
> > };
> >
> > +#define VHOST_SCSI_FEATURES VHOST_FEATURES_U64(vhost_scsi_features, 0)
> > +
> > #define VHOST_SCSI_MAX_TARGET 256
> > #define VHOST_SCSI_MAX_IO_VQ 1024
> > #define VHOST_SCSI_MAX_EVENT 128
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/test.c b/drivers/vhost/test.c
> > index 42c955a5b211..af727fccfe40 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/test.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/test.c
> > @@ -308,6 +308,12 @@ static long vhost_test_set_backend(struct vhost_test *n, unsigned index, int fd)
> > return r;
> > }
> >
> > +static const int vhost_test_features[] = {
> > + VHOST_FEATURES
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define VHOST_TEST_FEATURES VHOST_FEATURES_U64(vhost_test_features, 0)
> > +
> > static long vhost_test_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int ioctl,
> > unsigned long arg)
> > {
> > @@ -328,14 +334,14 @@ static long vhost_test_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int ioctl,
> > return -EFAULT;
> > return vhost_test_set_backend(n, backend.index, backend.fd);
> > case VHOST_GET_FEATURES:
> > - features = VHOST_FEATURES;
> > + features = VHOST_TEST_FEATURES;
> > if (copy_to_user(featurep, &features, sizeof features))
> > return -EFAULT;
> > return 0;
> > case VHOST_SET_FEATURES:
> > if (copy_from_user(&features, featurep, sizeof features))
> > return -EFAULT;
> > - if (features & ~VHOST_FEATURES)
> > + if (features & ~VHOST_TEST_FEATURES)
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > return vhost_test_set_features(n, features);
> > case VHOST_RESET_OWNER:
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> > index 621a6d9a8791..d8f1af9a0ff1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> > #include <linux/atomic.h>
> > #include <linux/vhost_iotlb.h>
> > #include <linux/irqbypass.h>
> > +#include <linux/unroll.h>
> >
> > struct vhost_work;
> > struct vhost_task;
> > @@ -279,14 +280,39 @@ void vhost_iotlb_map_free(struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb,
> > eventfd_signal((vq)->error_ctx);\
> > } while (0)
> >
> > -enum {
> > - VHOST_FEATURES = (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY) |
> > - (1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC) |
> > - (1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX) |
> > - (1ULL << VHOST_F_LOG_ALL) |
> > - (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT) |
> > - (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)
> > -};
> > +#define VHOST_FEATURES \
> > + VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY, \
> > + VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC, \
> > + VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX, \
> > + VHOST_F_LOG_ALL, \
> > + VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT, \
> > + VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1
> > +
> > +static inline u64 vhost_features_u64(const int *features, int size, int idx)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long res = 0;
>
> Should this be u64?
Ugh. Yes.
> > +
> > + unrolled_count(VIRTIO_FEATURES_BITS)
> > + for (int i = 0; i < size; ++i) {
> > + int bit = features[i];
> > +
> > + if (virtio_features_chk_bit(bit) && VIRTIO_U64(bit) == idx)
> > + res |= VIRTIO_BIT(bit);
> > + }
> > + return res;
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define VHOST_FEATURES_U64(features, idx) \
> > + vhost_features_u64(features, ARRAY_SIZE(features), idx)
> > +
> > +#define DEFINE_VHOST_FEATURES_ARRAY_ENTRY(idx, features) \
> > + [idx] = VHOST_FEATURES_U64(features, idx),
> > +
> > +#define DEFINE_VHOST_FEATURES_ARRAY(array, features) \
> > + u64 array[VIRTIO_FEATURES_U64S] = { \
> > + UNROLL(VIRTIO_FEATURES_U64S, \
> > + DEFINE_VHOST_FEATURES_ARRAY_ENTRY, features) \
> > + }
> >
> > /**
> > * vhost_vq_set_backend - Set backend.
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> > index ae01457ea2cd..16662f2b87c1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> > @@ -29,12 +29,14 @@
> > */
> > #define VHOST_VSOCK_PKT_WEIGHT 256
> >
> > -enum {
> > - VHOST_VSOCK_FEATURES = VHOST_FEATURES |
> > - (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM) |
> > - (1ULL << VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET)
> > +static const int vhost_vsock_features[] = {
> > + VHOST_FEATURES,
> > + VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM,
> > + VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET
> > };
> >
> > +#define VHOST_VSOCK_FEATURES VHOST_FEATURES_U64(vhost_vsock_features, 0)
> > +
> > enum {
> > VHOST_VSOCK_BACKEND_FEATURES = (1ULL << VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_MSG_V2)
> > };
> > --
> > MST
> >
>
> Thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-19 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-16 7:45 [PATCH v4 0/2] virtio: feature related cleanups Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-11-16 7:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] virtio: clean up features qword/dword terms Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-11-19 1:54 ` Jason Wang
2025-11-16 7:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost: switch to arrays of feature bits Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-11-19 2:03 ` Jason Wang
2025-11-19 6:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251119012322-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).