From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19EAE2E6CB2; Wed, 19 Nov 2025 22:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763592007; cv=none; b=li8q+F1DZ4XkG3MzWaW8Ymv9N9JH5fYM2bM3YK8FWtDU1YXv81RbMickO8H/52cuEbFbhLqocewRi8u8f0NoswKb1Fxn3zP3olOqqxBPUrKzoMTSTj70utH7pzwd0sOTddAKtFHsdEbGjc/dNFWFqVapheftP1KGxPZzwuh65UE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763592007; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nPEusvPgOAT/NwcTaXoVhxtHcPgLEuoF4hq8tl6Ym2M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kVZg8vhqumUJrKFkjU/zWq8AnldAZX/2Jcv7fzFsK5hTh00y85JKwnWjZO0Ftrdo8DqPhwyr0EQlK/2xEzt4poRFRTG8Yk0iKkrG0rwqTJ1DPIpgifV1Ez3NRsHTfjVp6HgLYgC4ChbC1SRWkGMeMnv0F0vELtlZcPE2W2JuuyQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WSpLMKwu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WSpLMKwu" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E70DC4CEF5; Wed, 19 Nov 2025 22:40:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1763592005; bh=nPEusvPgOAT/NwcTaXoVhxtHcPgLEuoF4hq8tl6Ym2M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WSpLMKwubKK/uuJ/ah6lCGsEP67W1mVEiB6oLXd1Oy+e3PDU5vcHAjc+umu7Khrjf pi22HF7KH5hmFgdWj1eWwYX+VVN7z4Op6yRM8o7JfBX2PXsCAmnpBNkIsr3EzDuyiL BdTQ64vQkVO0mcAicVT+tIeV8SxqOARHKbuLg50OyASau6FXheVDwcw2hfD6TbjE2u FaGrXzzthTNhQAkPsiw9Auq/eB6M5RO4bEWHronoGZlgaBljgpZzqF/BeJeQpVcTdC NvaTMH+aQVpqfpysQM2od4ehEQ+fiDLXNfVVPVfSsiBnu1uLpPBEt1ycSXSA2ozqNU oDgSAFjYj/c7A== Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 14:40:04 -0800 From: Kees Cook To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Cc: Jakub Kicinski , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] net: inet_sock.h: Avoid thousands of -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end warnings Message-ID: <202511191439.C737EF792@keescook> References: <20251023172518.3f370477@kernel.org> <949f472c-baca-4c2f-af23-7ba76fff1ddc@embeddedor.com> <20251024162354.0a94e4b1@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 01:36:41PM +0900, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > struct ip_options_data { > struct ip_options_rcu opt; > - char data[40]; > }; If this just contains struct ip_options_rcu now, can ip_options_data just be removed entirely? -Kees -- Kees Cook