netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jiefeng <jiefeng.z.zhang@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, edumazet@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, irusskikh@marvell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: atlantic: fix fragment overflow handling in RX path
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 18:01:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251121180152.562f3361@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADEc0q53dNkcfk+0ZKMRrqX99OfB-KonrZ8eO2r1EC-KLkfXgA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 22 Nov 2025 09:36:29 +0800 Jiefeng wrote:
> > Thank you for the feedback! I've updated the patch to v2 based on your
> > suggestion to skip extracting the zeroth fragment when frag_cnt ==
> > MAX_SKB_FRAGS.
> > This approach is simpler and aligns with your comment that extracting the
> > zeroth fragment is just a performance optimization, not necessary for
> > correctness.
> >
> > I've also included the stack trace from production (without timestamps) in
> > the commit message:
> >
> > The fix adds a check to skip extracting the zeroth fragment when
> > frag_cnt == MAX_SKB_FRAGS, preventing the fragment overflow.
> >
> > Please review the v2 patch.  
> 
> Hi, I've reconsidered the two approaches and I
> think fixing the existing check (assuming there will be an extra frag if
> buff->len > AQ_CFG_RX_HDR_SIZE) makes more sense. This approach:
> 
> 1. Prevents the overflow earlier in the code path
> 2. Ensures data completeness (all fragments are accounted for)
> 3. Avoids potential data loss from skipping the zeroth fragment
> 
> If you agree, I'll submit a v3 patch based on this approach. The fix
> will modify the existing check to include the potential zeroth
> fragment in the fragment count calculation.
> 
> Please let me know if this approach is acceptable.

Right, v2 is not correct. You'd need to calculate hdr_len earlier,
already taking into account whether there is space for the zeroth
frag. And if not - you can just allocate napi_alloc_skb() with enough
space, and copy the full buf. This would avoid the data loss.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-22  2:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-18  7:04 [PATCH net] net: atlantic: fix fragment overflow handling in RX path jiefeng.z.zhang
2025-11-18 20:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-19  8:38   ` Jiefeng
2025-11-20  3:03     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-20 13:06       ` Jiefeng
2025-11-22  1:36         ` Jiefeng
2025-11-22  2:01           ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-11-24 14:08             ` Jiefeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251121180152.562f3361@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=irusskikh@marvell.com \
    --cc=jiefeng.z.zhang@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).