From: "Günther Noack" <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
To: Mikhail Ivanov <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com>
Cc: mic@digikod.net, gnoack@google.com,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, matthieu@buffet.re,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, yusongping@huawei.com,
artem.kuzin@huawei.com, konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 12/19] selftests/landlock: Test socketpair(2) restriction
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2025 11:16:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251122.4795c4c3bb03@gnoack.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251118134639.3314803-13-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com>
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 09:46:32PM +0800, Mikhail Ivanov wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c
> index e22e10edb103..d1a004c2e0f5 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c
> @@ -866,4 +866,59 @@ TEST_F(tcp_protocol, alias_restriction)
> }
> }
>
> +static int test_socketpair(int family, int type, int protocol)
> +{
> + int fds[2];
> + int err;
> +
> + err = socketpair(family, type | SOCK_CLOEXEC, protocol, fds);
> + if (err)
> + return errno;
> + /*
> + * Mixing error codes from close(2) and socketpair(2) should not lead to
> + * any (access type) confusion for this test.
> + */
> + if (close(fds[0]) != 0)
> + return errno;
> + if (close(fds[1]) != 0)
> + return errno;
Very minor nit: the function leaks an FD if it returns early after the
first close() call failed. (Highly unlikely to happen though.)
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +TEST_F(mini, socketpair)
> +{
> + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
> + .handled_access_socket = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_SOCKET_CREATE,
> + };
> + const struct landlock_socket_attr unix_socket_create = {
> + .allowed_access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_SOCKET_CREATE,
> + .family = AF_UNIX,
> + .type = SOCK_STREAM,
> + .protocol = 0,
> + };
> + int ruleset_fd;
> +
> + /* Tries to create socket when ruleset is not established. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, test_socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0));
> + ruleset_fd =
> + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
> + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_SOCKET,
> + &unix_socket_create, 0));
> + enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd);
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
> +
> + /* Tries to create socket when protocol is allowed */
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, test_socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0));
> +
> + ruleset_fd =
> + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
You may want to check that landlock_create_ruleset() succeeded here:
ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd)
> + enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd);
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
> +
> + /* Tries to create socket when protocol is restricted. */
> + EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, test_socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0));
> +}
> +
> TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Otherwise, looks good.
–Günther
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-22 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-18 13:46 [RFC PATCH v4 00/19] Support socket access-control Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-18 13:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/19] landlock: " Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-22 10:49 ` Günther Noack
2025-11-22 11:13 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-22 12:18 ` Günther Noack
2025-11-22 16:51 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-18 13:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/19] selftests/landlock: Test creating a ruleset with unknown access Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-18 13:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/19] selftests/landlock: Test adding a socket rule Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-18 13:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/19] selftests/landlock: Testing adding rule with wildcard value Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-18 13:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/19] selftests/landlock: Test acceptable ranges of socket rule key Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-18 13:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/19] landlock: Add hook on socket creation Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-22 11:41 ` Günther Noack
2025-11-22 17:19 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-18 13:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/19] selftests/landlock: Test basic socket restriction Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-18 13:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/19] selftests/landlock: Test network stack error code consistency Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-18 13:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/19] selftests/landlock: Test overlapped rulesets with rules of protocol ranges Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-18 13:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/19] selftests/landlock: Test that kernel space sockets are not restricted Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-18 13:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/19] selftests/landlock: Test protocol mappings Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-18 13:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/19] selftests/landlock: Test socketpair(2) restriction Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-22 10:16 ` Günther Noack [this message]
2025-11-22 10:21 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-18 13:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/19] selftests/landlock: Test SCTP peeloff restriction Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-18 13:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/19] selftests/landlock: Test that accept(2) is not restricted Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-18 13:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/19] lsm: Support logging socket common data Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-18 13:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/19] landlock: Log socket creation denials Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-18 13:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 17/19] selftests/landlock: Test socket creation denial log for audit Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-18 13:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 18/19] samples/landlock: Support socket protocol restrictions Mikhail Ivanov
2025-11-18 13:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 19/19] landlock: Document socket rule type support Mikhail Ivanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251122.4795c4c3bb03@gnoack.org \
--to=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
--cc=artem.kuzin@huawei.com \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com \
--cc=konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthieu@buffet.re \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=yusongping@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).