From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00CB51487E9; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 03:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764040587; cv=none; b=qJ+vAQAeoXjaoFEQesLxxVkaydqMVSfEizsdhI3MQv4RJRf5TQ9aaS5RqdRd1XcfAS8Wm12EzuyQ4p/VZ9yKmby7P7ZPM13nnrka4LbfAkpq2ul0+gc69VmNzwEh+MfPRp2e9wnaeShh0o0ttAtEAYspjj7+6KwTWWugnBA20f0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764040587; c=relaxed/simple; bh=a8WIsxzYY5ccmQyP+xYCHnbss37O6M18Ac1MmX2Sqbw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Eh+0yTilCXhgtqcY2QynHlLC68A1/ZzhxkXpJ61atkIQFmrJTW92bDYE2EBI/chdUyviy7AKDMs1HY+6R1ZlMGElwGATJOkxIX4/8xUmjDLKjjHYCtQipNqgQFI5CWJAxh7tNt7vC1p23VwmJGefp4+esEjADjMXYRBqlb6fzhM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=S66o8ECL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="S66o8ECL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F5CCC4CEF1; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 03:16:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1764040586; bh=a8WIsxzYY5ccmQyP+xYCHnbss37O6M18Ac1MmX2Sqbw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=S66o8ECLlpMsBW5iFuTSVMEyKGepdGQuY8HLDciQmA34E5icSYQFWsBN3Z3bNclZF RNul8lTlRnQXqLvTfMixlKasWDObwxLRn9E8Mxo6DlZ01shftDzM4q8Uc5Sbi7S6/8 tJea8sR0h3hPigPTWSgkHVRa10nK7184GJDF7rcSFbTgaSH56yDOXBjHUltBaysviv AdIYpORwKdcVj7Q+s13SKCP9MOALC4AA260mCSLqoF3h/zKenmDxA5apk2U+jGzHhk nZmVe9SkDGokV1a36j+Z+oNjP1wzJzjLNMB5eOMi2+osoq7fC9gaBkGYjR9ROgSQV3 pI1juiu92Oe/A== Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 19:16:25 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Cong Wang Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Jamal Hadi Salim , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@willsroot.io, jschung2@proton.me, savy@syst3mfailure.io Subject: Re: [Bug 220774] New: netem is broken in 6.18 Message-ID: <20251124191625.74569868@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20251110123807.07ff5d89@phoenix> <20251121161322.1eb61823@phoenix.local> <20251121175556.26843d75@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 22 Nov 2025 10:14:50 -0800 Cong Wang wrote: > > I guess we forgot about mq.. IIRC mq doesn't come into play in > > duplication, we should be able to just adjust the check to allow > > This is not true, I warned you and Jamal with precisely the mq+netem > combination before applying the patch, both of you chose to ignore. I'm curious why we did.. Link?