From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] bpf: Fix FIONREAD and copied_seq issues
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 19:56:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251125115709.249440-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
syzkaller reported a bug [1] where a socket using sockmap, after being
unloaded, exposed incorrect copied_seq calculation. The selftest I
provided can be used to reproduce the issue reported by syzkaller.
TCP recvmsg seq # bug 2: copied E92C873, seq E68D125, rcvnxt E7CEB7C, fl 40
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5997 at net/ipv4/tcp.c:2724 tcp_recvmsg_locked+0xb2f/0x2910 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2724
Call Trace:
<TASK>
receive_fallback_to_copy net/ipv4/tcp.c:1968 [inline]
tcp_zerocopy_receive+0x131a/0x2120 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2200
do_tcp_getsockopt+0xe28/0x26c0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:4713
tcp_getsockopt+0xdf/0x100 net/ipv4/tcp.c:4812
do_sock_getsockopt+0x34d/0x440 net/socket.c:2421
__sys_getsockopt+0x12f/0x260 net/socket.c:2450
__do_sys_getsockopt net/socket.c:2457 [inline]
__se_sys_getsockopt net/socket.c:2454 [inline]
__x64_sys_getsockopt+0xbd/0x160 net/socket.c:2454
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xcd/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
A sockmap socket maintains its own receive queue (ingress_msg) which may
contain data from either its own protocol stack or forwarded from other
sockets.
FD1:read()
-- FD1->copied_seq++
| [read data]
|
[enqueue data] v
[sockmap] -> ingress to self -> ingress_msg queue
FD1 native stack ------> ^
-- FD1->rcv_nxt++ -> redirect to other | [enqueue data]
| |
| ingress to FD1
v ^
... | [sockmap]
FD2 native stack
The issue occurs when reading from ingress_msg: we update tp->copied_seq
by default, but if the data comes from other sockets (not the socket's
own protocol stack), tcp->rcv_nxt remains unchanged. Later, when
converting back to a native socket, reads may fail as copied_seq could
be significantly larger than rcv_nxt.
Additionally, FIONREAD calculation based on copied_seq and rcv_nxt is
insufficient for sockmap sockets, requiring separate field tracking.
[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=06dbd397158ec0ea4983
---
v1 -> v4: Use skmsg.sk instead of extending BPF_F_XXX macro and fix CI
failure reported by CI
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20251117110736.293040-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev/
Jiayuan Chen (3):
bpf, sockmap: Fix incorrect copied_seq calculation
bpf, sockmap: Fix FIONREAD for sockmap
bpf, selftest: Add tests for FIONREAD and copied_seq
include/linux/skmsg.h | 58 ++++-
net/core/skmsg.c | 28 ++-
net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c | 26 ++-
net/ipv4/udp_bpf.c | 25 ++-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c | 203 +++++++++++++++++-
.../bpf/progs/test_sockmap_pass_prog.c | 8 +
6 files changed, 331 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-11-25 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-25 11:56 Jiayuan Chen [this message]
2025-11-25 11:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/3] bpf, sockmap: Fix incorrect copied_seq calculation Jiayuan Chen
2025-11-25 11:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/3] bpf, sockmap: Fix FIONREAD for sockmap Jiayuan Chen
2025-11-25 12:26 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-11-25 11:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/3] bpf, selftest: Add tests for FIONREAD and copied_seq Jiayuan Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251125115709.249440-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--to=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mhal@rbox.co \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).