From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 687AA28F5 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2025 22:45:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764629145; cv=none; b=LWBKrg894oIvVqn+ucZLttb0fl0tQtCqjFYg3JOW6n3cWbpS7eIBpUZiWbj3MUUXVMHj/fKyDaGj40q3UsfMBqKxX8vkcb9TdkObpuRxr0wwXQa8ZHbhZrOUTrdiS5q5dVI8dwuzXf9BEKJqOQ3iOYgG4dhQBV4Co9VpuL/qjs8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764629145; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ralqT3QCc6mNpETQkK8u1CP22RyJ2XjLxXP4ULdFNHE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hfN9qEVFFLE3eSJk5FcfRLUqOU1LGNtxCD6KILEB6sselb/DG9RW7V0tYf66Hjzo2hyAoi31kJdsFm8EPz971jsvJDMP2cxRTOdE7MAr6SPhYEo+yvRTYW5daPIwFKDOsJn9k+3LKNYsARsBn2wACl9eTbbGwhF5l4JPQJvD6GA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ILWiSJhk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ILWiSJhk" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8070EC4CEF1; Mon, 1 Dec 2025 22:45:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1764629145; bh=ralqT3QCc6mNpETQkK8u1CP22RyJ2XjLxXP4ULdFNHE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ILWiSJhkp/VaffF7JGjHiwdKLLLbaIKPawPD4O7ExPt1/+7BWArOFcQ++7WgA0ojo Zr0eOdDhiUoT67q4MkXKkmLNpYiRVKfiDZvf9uBhMsMwahzA5+JWhVKnMgrOJVrd3g P4IRGxfPFFibReSQIeBFDv8IvwypwjPzfP/TFTiSGsb/v74iVjpqvxAxBvOGS9/Qo7 Wf54Tin+yMWdHgvGRcb7kwofMR+FymRP4hzce57/fO0RxJNSsxQlWAn2CL/4AZdImD PJu66oVYLcXDkmCWB6JeDmNcwka2cf8RXa0iV9JYZVkQb2+4I/WPmQhsR61KHQyQE9 4JOGNUgwu/6cg== Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 14:45:43 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Randy Dunlap Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Edward Cree , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , linux-net-drivers@amd.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sfc: correct kernel-doc complaints Message-ID: <20251201144543.26f845de@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20251129220351.1980981-1-rdunlap@infradead.org> References: <20251129220351.1980981-1-rdunlap@infradead.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 14:03:51 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: > + * @port_id: port id (Ethernet address) if !CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV; > + * for CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV, the VF port id Thanks for the cleanup, but TBH this one sounds a little bit awkward. Hopefully the SFC / AMD folks can suggest better wording. I'm dropping this version from PW, I'm trying to wrap up netdev for 6.19.. -- pw-bot: cr