From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73AA62AD35 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2025 04:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764650235; cv=none; b=bI21tq3xzcWNftIDrlICM36IjJHnDd+/PBjn3wfQ0PMy4ldfOgci/RdTOY6BjaHXX1HkDSa9+l7CGBYRfGJcvDc0VHkI++daiAdrv3I7N3SmIr1aAkfyP2pENiIRYJfXC/tN5LtZkQNU8XKmX817BSB5QQeg8qf8EzmwM11HTFQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764650235; c=relaxed/simple; bh=S6Xt23V0jPucA5Cjtx7tCokqfDY9IXspCSvNW7i/kC8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AbqULO94rfI/UlT7ImOnrWIqKX0sSlLaKe8aGbvsPWqP0scn4WUOdKaOOt1zPSJivqAE72+cODTmfazbrWa/YNEK6nsgB1xY3tjWVD3D9pxZwgZ3aR4oQHpxgM1rr5u82/jo8EungoQ9yotVDv64UrnFeDIyRg81nzZ3qr+67II= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=MmClQCsn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MmClQCsn" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1B88C4CEF1; Tue, 2 Dec 2025 04:37:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1764650234; bh=S6Xt23V0jPucA5Cjtx7tCokqfDY9IXspCSvNW7i/kC8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MmClQCsnJfR5VJ4rC2Ty0uUOtFwEOcG45CQMd2EDIRsN9jllqRWoqVa6kymEBPg0L vujaNkzHIR/xq5RYays1407GrV3EM7ZC4ge01ab8sjQpJBnc4djbmQaWR8Kgjcw3Da Zfs3fOlmm9PFj1MpaeaTbGeqxJ08Hz+3x7ID1TjJLnqskcSRvq35wkdLDK0qPuZ/uX oahdaxsPPJ84QJqjkWkgHRsmeZpCiwjehtADo9S+BN6BtBc5v/2hUTQSYlyeARzZVF rXNBZs+V6pLhQmt20U6h7ISs5PECGVymcJ61stQtbXngx8rQ2wfGy/+C4S08Ip2zQc EnSbkNzDBdEDw== Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 20:37:13 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] wireguard updates for 6.19 Message-ID: <20251201203713.58118d7e@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20251201022849.418666-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <20251201150729.521a927d@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 04:19:27 +0100 Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 03:07:29PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 03:28:38 +0100 Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: =20 > > > Please find here Asbj=C3=B8rn's yml series. This has been sitting in = my > > > testing for the last week or so, since he sent out the latest series, > > > and I haven't found any issues so far. Please pull! =20 > >=20 > > Hi Jason! Thanks for the quick turn around! You say "please pull" > > did you mean to include a PR in this or should I apply the patches=20 > > from the list? =20 >=20 > I meant from the list, because this is what Dave preferred way back > when, when WireGuard was a young pup. I actually prefer sending pulls, > as it feels less redundant and generally unifies my flow with how I > submit my other trees to Linus, and plus it means you can check a signed > tag. So I'll make a pull here, below. That gives me the opportunity to > drop the buggy 10/11 patch too. FWIW we do still ask for patches to be posted to the list. But some folks like to do _both_ that and include a branch/signed tag in the cover letter to pull. Pulled now, thanks!