From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2FDE329E42 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2025 17:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764784257; cv=none; b=mXWl+MJAquNenSTRNwDVa69DgZzkeDcWh9fyfEVR6glC5LBrwTl1xrUqQ7nB/lcqiuhndUNHWxhSsSqP9E6WSOZ5YWtHl5IuKBjDNsBuXKaG6+uB49s60/OC8+lxtehVB0dI5zCvUonUxKm9kDA7vb6gnHkUoNCtLecOqcnvViI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764784257; c=relaxed/simple; bh=L1Rjrz0SBhHBnz94D8LyL42lPT5lBfs2KcvUjbK/wuE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=D5gVVCpv3iR+tJ2TwwgtKKGe5pfXA7exKXs4n2mqCPCcBmYZh33JpWnPzA8+jMDzjOAOlc/NSXhl9IUuF3PtDOOzuhLbYf+Mwrm7eQJtQpgtiHp08J11fzZHExbwz9vphcmcr5X2/rJGFWvGSsYFwFtp/jsxx1NEObGO+y96zdE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=N+a4KuIx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="N+a4KuIx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE726C4CEF5; Wed, 3 Dec 2025 17:50:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1764784257; bh=L1Rjrz0SBhHBnz94D8LyL42lPT5lBfs2KcvUjbK/wuE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=N+a4KuIx2t2euweDgaiAMdfdUorO2A8WHrBYyCfOCsDZCEYxd0EAC2G37Kp7T4nts cGv/cOjJSi7RZqX6J6mrg9S8bEm9I5+l6QN4fS6xxJm2ox5hNxC30WQReKEkevKaxS Kn+EQJ13mXVTzYR8WLaLbgae6iWERQBvhPUDBukGda/9ZBMr9ORv8EYxiRLYWL9yQ6 OqeQN8qIr4qu36YR41NfdZqGm0T7zIHFAWB+8ymaiJ3klt0ibVvMDay/W1T8T7UMlW iYHqyOskbVU4R4CQQfZNfWLOstt71IRAgqMZs66Q1a9XG3BFzi9Djj7DEkuJ7ExnWv CzR4ibg9kknrQ== Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:50:55 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Petr Machata , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: [TEST] vxlan brige test flakiness Message-ID: <20251203095055.3718f079@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! We're seeing a few more flakes on vxlan-bridge-1q-mc-ul-sh and vxlan-bridge-1q-mc-ul-sh in the new setup than we used to (tho the former was always relatively flaky). # 141.78 [+13.13] TEST: VXLAN MC flood IPv6 mcroute changelink [FAIL] # 141.78 [+0.00] Expected 10 packets on H2, got 11 # 141.83 [+0.04] smcroutectl: mroute: deleting route from lo10 (192.0.2.33/32,233.252.0.1/32) https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?pass=0&executor=vmksft-forwarding&test=vxlan-bridge-1q-mc-ul-sh&pw-n=0 Perhaps we should make the filter more specific to the test traffic? LMK if you need access to the system.