From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBB6F1862A for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2025 00:26:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764980771; cv=none; b=DnFrhfyZZFRtDzu/slLAPKNmJN9v8gdbkznMJlPthYgVEBZkn0a1tvK0q1o0c3Aed3dAwjcJHrtz/KrbINQTA/06MQ4YEZfSCd8m8aMXiJiTLRmWpQNhLcBlB5DMqA/cRQ/F80D49Ri7STDglX3iFh7F9ZoVJ6qNxiBC0zQALEk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764980771; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HDkiTTdDro/uCFMb2K1P+c50E6kkwAfNk4xh3BVByO8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HxdggvdCRhiQ0KGCUwq2lqTyFXCIXxTYGRhDWuCcVr1rdST/RehrwJos5PecqXTOh9BC+OmtYfpoL6QczaBzdyF8pM5iQ1jJwglcTAwlVnGiysXOI73KXes4US4qgi4LML7Ji++RxiwyNWaJe8kdVBxwKCgA7Qm9ojKgtHD1iKQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=kX/0bYJ5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="kX/0bYJ5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7385FC4CEF1; Sat, 6 Dec 2025 00:26:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1764980771; bh=HDkiTTdDro/uCFMb2K1P+c50E6kkwAfNk4xh3BVByO8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=kX/0bYJ5YMMhwmVxWArRJSLco0YyjzurvzDlCzjpUKb/xtwIfE1kSWKLVBWlqD12y Ej/k3DKi2Y7dteVBQs6Ro2aLMReFrq38dLlwmJE/bhJabFKApfZOlBu9Izy4ChJVju mM23gp4rkK+J484T2lYyAiW9HZ++f5K5Vix1FHyesXv5WbKDbHD/96q/sVb0eAFdum DGgOgrJ5xIJE5aIxf9cy4YZiBWkBilf5uyLXcuWWbJhXRrdskJ5RQpTYfeH1lKFdWP dIDvBC4o+3hT4KyhsJi1+y9bvj/XP4yPYzsG8iMt8PfVDtUM1GKajF/3Fj1p01IGC6 FVIKG/RfkiU4Q== Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 16:26:10 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Petr Machata Cc: Subject: Re: [TEST] vxlan brige test flakiness Message-ID: <20251205162610.40143536@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <87345oyizz.fsf@nvidia.com> References: <20251203095055.3718f079@kernel.org> <87bjkexhhr.fsf@nvidia.com> <20251204104337.7edf0a31@kernel.org> <87345oyizz.fsf@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 17:16:56 +0100 Petr Machata wrote: > OK, cool. > > I think the following patch would fix the issue. But I think it should > be thematically split into two parts, the lib.sh fix needs its own > explanation. Then there is a third patch to get rid of the > now-unnecessary vx_wait() helper. > > I think it makes sense to send it all as next material after you open it > in January. But if the issue is super annoying, I can send the two-part > fix now for net, and the cleanup in January for next. > > Let me know what you prefer. I think both the fix and the cleanup would be acceptable at this stage of the merge window. But no strong preference, I queued up the diff you shared as a local NIPA patch so we can see how it fares over the weekend. And it will get auto-ejected when you post the real thing.