From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, memxor@gmail.com,
martin.lau@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, haoluo@google.com,
ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/16] bpf: Save memory allocation method and size in bpf_local_storage_elem
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 09:56:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251218175628.1460321-10-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251218175628.1460321-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>
A later patch will introduce bpf_selem_unlink_lockless() to handle
rqspinlock errors. bpf_selem_unlink_lockless() will allow an selem
to be partially unlinked from map or local storage. Therefore,
bpf_selem_free() needs to be decoupled from map and local storage
as SDATA(selem)->smap or selem->local_storage may be NULL.
Decoupling from local storage is already done when local storage
migrated from BPF memory allocator to kmalloc_nolock(). This patch
prepares to decouple from map.
Currently, map is still needed in bpf_selem_free() to:
1. Uncharge memory
a. map->ops->map_local_storage_uncharge
b. map->elem_size
2. Infer how memory should be freed
a. map->use_kmalloc_nolock
3. Free special fields
a. map->record
The dependency of 1.a will be addressed by a later patch by returning
the amount of memory to uncharge directly to the owner who calls
bpf_local_storage_destroy().
The dependency of 3.a will be addressed by a later patch by freeing
special fields under b->lock, when the map is still alive.
This patch handles 1.b and 2.a by simply saving the informnation in
bpf_local_storage_elem.
Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h | 4 +++-
kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
index 70b35dfc01c9..20918c31b7e5 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
@@ -80,7 +80,9 @@ struct bpf_local_storage_elem {
* after raw_spin_unlock
*/
};
- /* 8 bytes hole */
+ u16 size;
+ bool use_kmalloc_nolock;
+ /* 4 bytes hole */
/* The data is stored in another cacheline to minimize
* the number of cachelines access during a cache hit.
*/
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
index 667b468652d1..62201552dca6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
@@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ bpf_selem_alloc(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap, void *owner,
if (swap_uptrs)
bpf_obj_swap_uptrs(smap->map.record, SDATA(selem)->data, value);
}
+ selem->size = smap->elem_size;
+ selem->use_kmalloc_nolock = smap->use_kmalloc_nolock;
return selem;
}
@@ -219,7 +221,7 @@ void bpf_selem_free(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem,
smap = rcu_dereference_check(SDATA(selem)->smap, bpf_rcu_lock_held());
- if (!smap->use_kmalloc_nolock) {
+ if (!selem->use_kmalloc_nolock) {
/*
* No uptr will be unpin even when reuse_now == false since uptr
* is only supported in task local storage, where
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-18 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-18 17:56 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/16] Remove task and cgroup local storage percpu counters Amery Hung
2025-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/16] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink_map to failable Amery Hung
2025-12-18 18:27 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-08 20:40 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-01-08 20:29 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-01-09 18:39 ` Amery Hung
2026-01-09 21:53 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-01-12 17:47 ` Amery Hung
2025-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/16] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_link_map " Amery Hung
2025-12-18 18:19 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/16] bpf: Open code bpf_selem_unlink_storage in bpf_selem_unlink Amery Hung
2026-01-09 17:42 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-01-09 18:49 ` Amery Hung
2025-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/16] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink to failable Amery Hung
2025-12-18 18:27 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-09 18:16 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-01-09 18:49 ` Amery Hung
2025-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/16] bpf: Change local_storage->lock and b->lock to rqspinlock Amery Hung
2025-12-18 18:27 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/16] bpf: Remove task local storage percpu counter Amery Hung
2025-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/16] bpf: Remove cgroup " Amery Hung
2025-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/16] bpf: Remove unused percpu counter from bpf_local_storage_map_free Amery Hung
2025-12-18 17:56 ` Amery Hung [this message]
2025-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/16] bpf: Support lockless unlink when freeing map or local storage Amery Hung
2026-01-09 20:16 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-01-09 20:47 ` Amery Hung
2026-01-09 21:38 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-01-12 22:38 ` Amery Hung
2026-01-13 0:15 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-01-12 15:36 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-01-12 15:49 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-01-12 21:17 ` Amery Hung
2025-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/16] bpf: Switch to bpf_selem_unlink_lockless in bpf_local_storage_{map_free, destroy} Amery Hung
2025-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/16] selftests/bpf: Update sk_storage_omem_uncharge test Amery Hung
2025-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/16] selftests/bpf: Update task_local_storage/recursion test Amery Hung
2025-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/16] selftests/bpf: Update task_local_storage/task_storage_nodeadlock test Amery Hung
2025-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/16] selftests/bpf: Remove test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup Amery Hung
2025-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 16/16] selftests/bpf: Choose another percpu variable in bpf for btf_dump test Amery Hung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251218175628.1460321-10-ameryhung@gmail.com \
--to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox