netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] virtio-net: enable all napis before scheduling refill work
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 08:42:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251221084218-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5434a67e-dd6e-4cd1-870b-fdd32ad34a28@gmail.com>

On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 12:03:29PM +0700, Bui Quang Minh wrote:
> On 12/17/25 09:58, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 12:23 AM Bui Quang Minh
> > <minhquangbui99@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 12/16/25 11:16, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 11:28 PM Bui Quang Minh
> > > > <minhquangbui99@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Calling napi_disable() on an already disabled napi can cause the
> > > > > deadlock. In commit 4bc12818b363 ("virtio-net: disable delayed refill
> > > > > when pausing rx"), to avoid the deadlock, when pausing the RX in
> > > > > virtnet_rx_pause[_all](), we disable and cancel the delayed refill work.
> > > > > However, in the virtnet_rx_resume_all(), we enable the delayed refill
> > > > > work too early before enabling all the receive queue napis.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The deadlock can be reproduced by running
> > > > > selftests/drivers/net/hw/xsk_reconfig.py with multiqueue virtio-net
> > > > > device and inserting a cond_resched() inside the for loop in
> > > > > virtnet_rx_resume_all() to increase the success rate. Because the worker
> > > > > processing the delayed refilled work runs on the same CPU as
> > > > > virtnet_rx_resume_all(), a reschedule is needed to cause the deadlock.
> > > > > In real scenario, the contention on netdev_lock can cause the
> > > > > reschedule.
> > > > > 
> > > > > This fixes the deadlock by ensuring all receive queue's napis are
> > > > > enabled before we enable the delayed refill work in
> > > > > virtnet_rx_resume_all() and virtnet_open().
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fixes: 4bc12818b363 ("virtio-net: disable delayed refill when pausing rx")
> > > > > Reported-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> > > > > Closes: https://netdev-ctrl.bots.linux.dev/logs/vmksft/drv-hw-dbg/results/400961/3-xdp-py/stderr
> > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > > - Move try_fill_recv() before rx napi_enable()
> > > > > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20251208153419.18196-1-minhquangbui99@gmail.com/
> > > > > ---
> > > > >    drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > > > >    1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > index 8e04adb57f52..4e08880a9467 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > @@ -3214,21 +3214,31 @@ static void virtnet_update_settings(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> > > > >    static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
> > > > >    {
> > > > >           struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> > > > > +       bool schedule_refill = false;
> > > > >           int i, err;
> > > > > 
> > > > > -       enable_delayed_refill(vi);
> > > > > -
> > > > > +       /* - We must call try_fill_recv before enabling napi of the same receive
> > > > > +        * queue so that it doesn't race with the call in virtnet_receive.
> > > > > +        * - We must enable and schedule delayed refill work only when we have
> > > > > +        * enabled all the receive queue's napi. Otherwise, in refill_work, we
> > > > > +        * have a deadlock when calling napi_disable on an already disabled
> > > > > +        * napi.
> > > > > +        */
> > > > >           for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> > > > >                   if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
> > > > >                           /* Make sure we have some buffers: if oom use wq. */
> > > > >                           if (!try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
> > > > > -                               schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> > > > > +                               schedule_refill = true;
> > > > > 
> > > > >                   err = virtnet_enable_queue_pair(vi, i);
> > > > >                   if (err < 0)
> > > > >                           goto err_enable_qp;
> > > > >           }
> > > > So NAPI could be scheduled and it may want to refill but since refill
> > > > is not enabled, there would be no refill work.
> > > > 
> > > > Is this a problem?
> > > You are right. It is indeed a problem.
> > > 
> > > I think we can unconditionally schedule the delayed refill after
> > > enabling all the RX NAPIs (don't check the boolean schedule_refill
> > > anymore) to ensure that we will have refill work. We can still keep the
> > > try_fill_recv here to fill the receive buffer earlier in normal case.
> > > What do you think?
> > Or we can have a reill_pending
> 
> Okay, let me implement this in the next version.
> 
> > but basically I think we need something
> > that is much more simple. That is, using a per rq work instead of a
> > global one?
> 
> I think we can leave this in a net-next patch later.
> 
> Thanks,
> Quang Minh

i am not sure per rq is not simpler than this pile of tricks.


> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > > +       enable_delayed_refill(vi);
> > > > > +       if (schedule_refill)
> > > > > +               schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> > > > > +
> > > > >           if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS)) {
> > > > >                   if (vi->status & VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP)
> > > > >                           netif_carrier_on(vi->dev);
> > > > > @@ -3463,39 +3473,48 @@ static void virtnet_rx_pause(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq)
> > > > >           __virtnet_rx_pause(vi, rq);
> > > > >    }
> > > > > 
> > > > Thanks
> > > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Quang Minh.
> > > 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-21 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-12 15:27 [PATCH net v2] virtio-net: enable all napis before scheduling refill work Bui Quang Minh
2025-12-16  4:16 ` Jason Wang
2025-12-16 16:23   ` Bui Quang Minh
2025-12-17  2:58     ` Jason Wang
2025-12-19  5:03       ` Bui Quang Minh
2025-12-21 13:42         ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2025-12-22 11:58           ` Paolo Abeni
2025-12-22 23:11             ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251221084218-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=minhquangbui99@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).