From: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>,
Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 5/5] net/mlx5e: Dealloc forgotten PSP RX modify header
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2025 15:27:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251225132717.358820-6-mbloch@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251225132717.358820-1-mbloch@nvidia.com>
From: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
The commit which added RX steering rules for PSP forgot to free a modify
header HW object on the cleanup path, which lead to health errors when
reloading the driver and uninitializing the device:
mlx5_core 0000:08:00.0: poll_health:803:(pid 3021): Fatal error 3 detected
Fix that by saving the modify header pointer in the PSP steering struct
and deallocating it after freeing the rule which references it.
Fixes: 9536fbe10c9d ("net/mlx5e: Add PSP steering in local NIC RX")
Signed-off-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
---
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/psp.c | 14 +++++++++++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/psp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/psp.c
index 38e7c77cc851..9a74438ce10a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/psp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/psp.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ struct mlx5e_accel_fs_psp_prot {
struct mlx5_flow_table *ft;
struct mlx5_flow_group *miss_group;
struct mlx5_flow_handle *miss_rule;
+ struct mlx5_modify_hdr *rx_modify_hdr;
struct mlx5_flow_destination default_dest;
struct mlx5e_psp_rx_err rx_err;
u32 refcnt;
@@ -286,13 +287,19 @@ static int accel_psp_fs_rx_err_create_ft(struct mlx5e_psp_fs *fs,
return err;
}
-static void accel_psp_fs_rx_fs_destroy(struct mlx5e_accel_fs_psp_prot *fs_prot)
+static void accel_psp_fs_rx_fs_destroy(struct mlx5e_psp_fs *fs,
+ struct mlx5e_accel_fs_psp_prot *fs_prot)
{
if (fs_prot->def_rule) {
mlx5_del_flow_rules(fs_prot->def_rule);
fs_prot->def_rule = NULL;
}
+ if (fs_prot->rx_modify_hdr) {
+ mlx5_modify_header_dealloc(fs->mdev, fs_prot->rx_modify_hdr);
+ fs_prot->rx_modify_hdr = NULL;
+ }
+
if (fs_prot->miss_rule) {
mlx5_del_flow_rules(fs_prot->miss_rule);
fs_prot->miss_rule = NULL;
@@ -396,6 +403,7 @@ static int accel_psp_fs_rx_create_ft(struct mlx5e_psp_fs *fs,
modify_hdr = NULL;
goto out_err;
}
+ fs_prot->rx_modify_hdr = modify_hdr;
flow_act.action = MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_FWD_DEST |
MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_CRYPTO_DECRYPT |
@@ -416,7 +424,7 @@ static int accel_psp_fs_rx_create_ft(struct mlx5e_psp_fs *fs,
goto out;
out_err:
- accel_psp_fs_rx_fs_destroy(fs_prot);
+ accel_psp_fs_rx_fs_destroy(fs, fs_prot);
out:
kvfree(flow_group_in);
kvfree(spec);
@@ -433,7 +441,7 @@ static int accel_psp_fs_rx_destroy(struct mlx5e_psp_fs *fs, enum accel_fs_psp_ty
/* The netdev unreg already happened, so all offloaded rule are already removed */
fs_prot = &accel_psp->fs_prot[type];
- accel_psp_fs_rx_fs_destroy(fs_prot);
+ accel_psp_fs_rx_fs_destroy(fs, fs_prot);
accel_psp_fs_rx_err_destroy_ft(fs, &fs_prot->rx_err);
--
2.34.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-25 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-25 13:27 [PATCH net 0/5] mlx5 misc fixes 2025-12-25 Mark Bloch
2025-12-25 13:27 ` [PATCH net 1/5] net/mlx5: Lag, multipath, give priority for routes with smaller network prefix Mark Bloch
2025-12-25 13:27 ` [PATCH net 2/5] net/mlx5e: Don't gate FEC histograms on ppcnt_statistical_group Mark Bloch
2025-12-25 13:27 ` [PATCH net 3/5] net/mlx5e: Fix NULL pointer dereference in ioctl module EEPROM query Mark Bloch
2025-12-25 13:27 ` [PATCH net 4/5] net/mlx5e: Don't print error message due to invalid module Mark Bloch
2025-12-25 13:27 ` Mark Bloch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251225132717.358820-6-mbloch@nvidia.com \
--to=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).