From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-patches-bot@fb.com, Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] bpf, arm64: tailcall: Eliminate max_entries and bpf_func access at runtime
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2026 23:00:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260102150032.53106-4-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260102150032.53106-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Apply the same tail call optimization to arm64 as done for x86_64.
When the prog array map is known at verification time (dyn_array=false):
- Embed max_entries as an immediate value instead of loading from memory
- Use the precomputed target from array->ptrs[max_entries + index]
- Jump directly to the cached target without dereferencing prog->bpf_func
When the map is dynamically determined (dyn_array=true):
- Load max_entries from the array at runtime
- Look up prog from array->ptrs[index] and compute the target address
Implement bpf_arch_tail_call_prologue_offset() returning
"PROLOGUE_OFFSET * 4" to convert the instruction count to bytes.
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 0c4d44bcfbf4..bcd890bff36a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -620,8 +620,10 @@ static int build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool ebpf_from_cbpf)
return 0;
}
-static int emit_bpf_tail_call(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
+static int emit_bpf_tail_call(struct jit_ctx *ctx, u32 map_index, bool dyn_array)
{
+ struct bpf_map *map = ctx->prog->aux->used_maps[map_index];
+
/* bpf_tail_call(void *prog_ctx, struct bpf_array *array, u64 index) */
const u8 r2 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_2];
const u8 r3 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_3];
@@ -638,9 +640,13 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
/* if (index >= array->map.max_entries)
* goto out;
*/
- off = offsetof(struct bpf_array, map.max_entries);
- emit_a64_mov_i64(tmp, off, ctx);
- emit(A64_LDR32(tmp, r2, tmp), ctx);
+ if (dyn_array) {
+ off = offsetof(struct bpf_array, map.max_entries);
+ emit_a64_mov_i64(tmp, off, ctx);
+ emit(A64_LDR32(tmp, r2, tmp), ctx);
+ } else {
+ emit_a64_mov_i64(tmp, map->max_entries, ctx);
+ }
emit(A64_MOV(0, r3, r3), ctx);
emit(A64_CMP(0, r3, tmp), ctx);
branch1 = ctx->image + ctx->idx;
@@ -659,15 +665,26 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
/* (*tail_call_cnt_ptr)++; */
emit(A64_ADD_I(1, tcc, tcc, 1), ctx);
- /* prog = array->ptrs[index];
- * if (prog == NULL)
- * goto out;
- */
- off = offsetof(struct bpf_array, ptrs);
- emit_a64_mov_i64(tmp, off, ctx);
- emit(A64_ADD(1, tmp, r2, tmp), ctx);
- emit(A64_LSL(1, prg, r3, 3), ctx);
- emit(A64_LDR64(prg, tmp, prg), ctx);
+ if (dyn_array) {
+ /* prog = array->ptrs[index];
+ * if (prog == NULL)
+ * goto out;
+ */
+ off = offsetof(struct bpf_array, ptrs);
+ emit_a64_mov_i64(tmp, off, ctx);
+ emit(A64_ADD(1, tmp, r2, tmp), ctx);
+ emit(A64_LSL(1, prg, r3, 3), ctx);
+ emit(A64_LDR64(prg, tmp, prg), ctx);
+ } else {
+ /* tgt = array->ptrs[max_entries + index];
+ * if (tgt == 0)
+ * goto out;
+ */
+ emit(A64_LSL(1, prg, r3, 3), ctx);
+ off = offsetof(struct bpf_array, ptrs) + map->max_entries * sizeof(void *);
+ emit_a64_add_i(1, prg, prg, tmp, off, ctx);
+ emit(A64_LDR64(prg, r2, prg), ctx);
+ }
branch3 = ctx->image + ctx->idx;
emit(A64_NOP, ctx);
@@ -680,12 +697,17 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
pop_callee_regs(ctx);
- /* goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_offset); */
- off = offsetof(struct bpf_prog, bpf_func);
- emit_a64_mov_i64(tmp, off, ctx);
- emit(A64_LDR64(tmp, prg, tmp), ctx);
- emit(A64_ADD_I(1, tmp, tmp, sizeof(u32) * PROLOGUE_OFFSET), ctx);
- emit(A64_BR(tmp), ctx);
+ if (dyn_array) {
+ /* goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_offset); */
+ off = offsetof(struct bpf_prog, bpf_func);
+ emit_a64_mov_i64(tmp, off, ctx);
+ emit(A64_LDR64(tmp, prg, tmp), ctx);
+ emit(A64_ADD_I(1, tmp, tmp, sizeof(u32) * PROLOGUE_OFFSET), ctx);
+ emit(A64_BR(tmp), ctx);
+ } else {
+ /* goto *tgt; */
+ emit(A64_BR(prg), ctx);
+ }
if (ctx->image) {
off = &ctx->image[ctx->idx] - branch1;
@@ -701,6 +723,12 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
return 0;
}
+int bpf_arch_tail_call_prologue_offset(void)
+{
+ /* offset is in instructions, convert to bytes */
+ return PROLOGUE_OFFSET * 4;
+}
+
static int emit_atomic_ld_st(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
const s32 imm = insn->imm;
@@ -1617,7 +1645,10 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx,
}
/* tail call */
case BPF_JMP | BPF_TAIL_CALL:
- if (emit_bpf_tail_call(ctx))
+ bool dynamic_array = (insn->imm >> 8) & 0xFF;
+ u32 map_index = insn->imm & 0xFF;
+
+ if (emit_bpf_tail_call(ctx, map_index, dynamic_array))
return -EFAULT;
break;
/* function return */
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-02 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-02 15:00 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf: tailcall: Eliminate max_entries and bpf_func access at runtime Leon Hwang
2026-01-02 15:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] bpf: tailcall: Introduce bpf_arch_tail_call_prologue_offset Leon Hwang
2026-01-02 15:21 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-02 15:38 ` Leon Hwang
2026-01-02 15:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] bpf, x64: tailcall: Eliminate max_entries and bpf_func access at runtime Leon Hwang
2026-01-02 15:00 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-01-02 15:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] bpf, lib/test_bpf: Fix broken tailcall tests Leon Hwang
2026-01-03 0:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf: tailcall: Eliminate max_entries and bpf_func access at runtime Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260102150032.53106-4-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).