From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-patches-bot@fb.com, Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] bpf, lib/test_bpf: Fix broken tailcall tests
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2026 23:00:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260102150032.53106-5-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260102150032.53106-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Update the tail call tests in test_bpf to work with the new tail call
optimization that requires:
1. A valid used_maps array pointing to the prog array
2. Precomputed tail call targets in array->ptrs[max_entries + index]
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
lib/test_bpf.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index af0041df2b72..680d34d46f19 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -15448,26 +15448,45 @@ static void __init destroy_tail_call_tests(struct bpf_array *progs)
{
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tail_call_tests); i++)
- if (progs->ptrs[i])
- bpf_prog_free(progs->ptrs[i]);
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tail_call_tests); i++) {
+ struct bpf_prog *fp = progs->ptrs[i];
+
+ if (!fp)
+ continue;
+
+ /*
+ * The used_maps points to fake maps that don't have
+ * proper ops, so clear it before bpf_prog_free to avoid
+ * bpf_free_used_maps trying to process it.
+ */
+ kfree(fp->aux->used_maps);
+ fp->aux->used_maps = NULL;
+ fp->aux->used_map_cnt = 0;
+ bpf_prog_free(fp);
+ }
kfree(progs);
}
static __init int prepare_tail_call_tests(struct bpf_array **pprogs)
{
+ int prologue_offset = bpf_arch_tail_call_prologue_offset();
int ntests = ARRAY_SIZE(tail_call_tests);
+ u32 max_entries = ntests + 1;
struct bpf_array *progs;
int which, err;
/* Allocate the table of programs to be used for tail calls */
- progs = kzalloc(struct_size(progs, ptrs, ntests + 1), GFP_KERNEL);
+ progs = kzalloc(struct_size(progs, ptrs, max_entries * 2), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!progs)
goto out_nomem;
+ /* Set max_entries before JIT, as it's used in JIT */
+ progs->map.max_entries = max_entries;
+
/* Create all eBPF programs and populate the table */
for (which = 0; which < ntests; which++) {
struct tail_call_test *test = &tail_call_tests[which];
+ struct bpf_map *map = &progs->map;
struct bpf_prog *fp;
int len, i;
@@ -15487,10 +15506,16 @@ static __init int prepare_tail_call_tests(struct bpf_array **pprogs)
if (!fp)
goto out_nomem;
+ fp->aux->used_maps = kmalloc_array(1, sizeof(map), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!fp->aux->used_maps)
+ goto out_nomem;
+
fp->len = len;
fp->type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER;
fp->aux->stack_depth = test->stack_depth;
fp->aux->tail_call_reachable = test->has_tail_call;
+ fp->aux->used_maps[0] = map;
+ fp->aux->used_map_cnt = 1;
memcpy(fp->insnsi, test->insns, len * sizeof(struct bpf_insn));
/* Relocate runtime tail call offsets and addresses */
@@ -15548,6 +15573,10 @@ static __init int prepare_tail_call_tests(struct bpf_array **pprogs)
if ((long)__bpf_call_base + insn->imm != addr)
*insn = BPF_JMP_A(0); /* Skip: NOP */
break;
+
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_TAIL_CALL:
+ insn->imm = 0;
+ break;
}
}
@@ -15555,11 +15584,11 @@ static __init int prepare_tail_call_tests(struct bpf_array **pprogs)
if (err)
goto out_err;
+ progs->ptrs[max_entries + which] = (void *) fp->bpf_func + prologue_offset;
progs->ptrs[which] = fp;
}
/* The last entry contains a NULL program pointer */
- progs->map.max_entries = ntests + 1;
*pprogs = progs;
return 0;
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-02 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-02 15:00 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf: tailcall: Eliminate max_entries and bpf_func access at runtime Leon Hwang
2026-01-02 15:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] bpf: tailcall: Introduce bpf_arch_tail_call_prologue_offset Leon Hwang
2026-01-02 15:21 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-02 15:38 ` Leon Hwang
2026-01-02 15:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] bpf, x64: tailcall: Eliminate max_entries and bpf_func access at runtime Leon Hwang
2026-01-02 15:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] bpf, arm64: " Leon Hwang
2026-01-02 15:00 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-01-03 0:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf: " Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260102150032.53106-5-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).