From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
dsahern@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
jiang.biao@linux.dev, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/11] bpf: use last 8-bits for the nr_args in trampoline
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 14:43:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260107064352.291069-3-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260107064352.291069-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
For now, ctx[-1] is used to store the nr_args in the trampoline. However,
1-byte is enough to store such information. Therefore, we use only the
last byte of ctx[-1] to store the nr_args, and reserve the rest for other
usages.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 774c9b0aafa3..bfff3f84fd91 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -23277,15 +23277,16 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_func_arg) {
/* Load nr_args from ctx - 8 */
insn_buf[0] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8);
- insn_buf[1] = BPF_JMP32_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0, 6);
- insn_buf[2] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_2, 3);
- insn_buf[3] = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1);
- insn_buf[4] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0);
- insn_buf[5] = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, 0);
- insn_buf[6] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0);
- insn_buf[7] = BPF_JMP_A(1);
- insn_buf[8] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, -EINVAL);
- cnt = 9;
+ insn_buf[1] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 0xFF);
+ insn_buf[2] = BPF_JMP32_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0, 6);
+ insn_buf[3] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_2, 3);
+ insn_buf[4] = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1);
+ insn_buf[5] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0);
+ insn_buf[6] = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, 0);
+ insn_buf[7] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0);
+ insn_buf[8] = BPF_JMP_A(1);
+ insn_buf[9] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, -EINVAL);
+ cnt = 10;
new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
if (!new_prog)
@@ -23305,12 +23306,13 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
eatype == BPF_MODIFY_RETURN) {
/* Load nr_args from ctx - 8 */
insn_buf[0] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8);
- insn_buf[1] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_0, 3);
- insn_buf[2] = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1);
- insn_buf[3] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, 0);
- insn_buf[4] = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, 0);
- insn_buf[5] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0);
- cnt = 6;
+ insn_buf[1] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 0xFF);
+ insn_buf[2] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_0, 3);
+ insn_buf[3] = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1);
+ insn_buf[4] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, 0);
+ insn_buf[5] = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, 0);
+ insn_buf[6] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0);
+ cnt = 7;
} else {
insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, -EOPNOTSUPP);
cnt = 1;
@@ -23331,8 +23333,9 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_func_arg_cnt) {
/* Load nr_args from ctx - 8 */
insn_buf[0] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8);
+ insn_buf[1] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 0xFF);
- new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, 1);
+ new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, 2);
if (!new_prog)
return -ENOMEM;
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 6e076485bf70..6b58f9a4dc92 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -1194,7 +1194,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_branch_snapshot_proto = {
BPF_CALL_3(get_func_arg, void *, ctx, u32, n, u64 *, value)
{
/* This helper call is inlined by verifier. */
- u64 nr_args = ((u64 *)ctx)[-1];
+ u64 nr_args = ((u64 *)ctx)[-1] & 0xFF;
if ((u64) n >= nr_args)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1214,7 +1214,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_func_arg_proto = {
BPF_CALL_2(get_func_ret, void *, ctx, u64 *, value)
{
/* This helper call is inlined by verifier. */
- u64 nr_args = ((u64 *)ctx)[-1];
+ u64 nr_args = ((u64 *)ctx)[-1] & 0xFF;
*value = ((u64 *)ctx)[nr_args];
return 0;
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-07 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-07 6:43 [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/11] bpf: fsession support Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 01/11] bpf: add " Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` Menglong Dong [this message]
2026-01-07 7:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/11] bpf: use last 8-bits for the nr_args in trampoline bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-07 7:50 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/11] bpf: change prototype of bpf_session_{cookie,is_return} Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/11] bpf: support fsession for bpf_session_is_return Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 7:11 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-07 7:45 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/11] bpf: support fsession for bpf_session_cookie Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/11] bpf,x86: introduce emit_st_r0_imm64() for trampoline Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/11] bpf,x86: add fsession support for x86_64 Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 7:11 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-07 7:55 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/11] libbpf: add fsession support Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 09/11] selftests/bpf: add testcases for fsession Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/11] selftests/bpf: add testcases for fsession cookie Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 11/11] selftests/bpf: test fsession mixed with fentry and fexit Menglong Dong
2026-01-07 6:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/11] bpf: fsession support Menglong Dong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260107064352.291069-3-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn \
--to=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiang.biao@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox