From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E4E730F930 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 07:47:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768290426; cv=none; b=fePB85Jnu4qWsfqDRn9DrAyZrwXm2EbOP8CtwN4AF7oiO77B3boomlviYXbHEuxV/Hqr2iYCf7d/lt5DlACr2YzEeJAOUSxeOm0eSy1pCdpBV4tlu0zQM5hPQ4Pw+aplzlyWjql37zJyZDgV6PNu0Gdc19b3ulBatCdmuqKaBqA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768290426; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UAF5AqV5fmYHBM6V12ZExeDyaoxsECrynL/uccTwT80=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=T6xnGjB0YXfxzj0v3tExl7/o7zyQPk4OU7IdXdHpDjePkSZm9+mFywOg258DSQAB6CEzdgwz9QNik7HAPYiJskRGc8qERUVWqY4BnwyV4JyNTBAaZtCyFIn2eSzWo8wveay2jBdC8yAi1Nst8fTsVv1xUfW5BFcRRwgmsNZy/Xs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=F/9srFvD; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Jg0dk1WN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="F/9srFvD"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Jg0dk1WN" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1768290422; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZLqUUybaD7tlYRqUfcBJbxPEI8ZYA6NTfdyH3KvYcYk=; b=F/9srFvDYowvlejB6HTfvkzGNJqUjhWphcv1Imxb/8gzq4ArOM8aVal0SCtJs7LHBNZB11 Rtnqhpv/AwDotQZtzrZjBlfo1feY3qsK9mTWB15uMVCVu2QUpU2Bjb+jcCViecKvF8aaBu MTSLy5R84inT1Zhh9Cit11XjRrGBG2k= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-151-K0UH7sxaOdyYKHypbfJBYw-1; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 02:47:01 -0500 X-MC-Unique: K0UH7sxaOdyYKHypbfJBYw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: K0UH7sxaOdyYKHypbfJBYw_1768290420 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4776079ada3so72117665e9.1 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 23:47:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1768290420; x=1768895220; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZLqUUybaD7tlYRqUfcBJbxPEI8ZYA6NTfdyH3KvYcYk=; b=Jg0dk1WN36mOsqLkcJ2YPs66FqiJlGlwtI8vY8SBxoz6iRajMlkDOQ+4WW95qppMl8 rJETmQzGy2gUwy5smYQP4oH6UEHVg39npJmYTATWx2xC66i2R3UA6b2Khbtff5C6s4lM kyCsAeHquOZ20lZsF5eloqnGz8Vo8uRk5AM5DdSLSUJ4rlsZK6wLM0JH8LTgd24pUsmj RSz1pKnQfvYIyDcTq1q1aZawuB2cejG+i8cvzWc+EWSJq+7qf4J+Pwe4dJztHzTRqFj2 Q4baL7uULpM3Rw8n2LUq9O4wUJQzrl013Ep8jDm5HyajM166tOXPj+SLNS9yiTDAkr5S IqGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1768290420; x=1768895220; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZLqUUybaD7tlYRqUfcBJbxPEI8ZYA6NTfdyH3KvYcYk=; b=t/vc0sXFLDM7uDWh4ui3fnZkM6mIrWhfjoHcG1eJzRO/VRUIOr1UpTrD1MCDY53lBj 0gvMnKvZXvDbEbh3l24pa9SbjtA8dDDDwbjC9heIlkO17q14fiMltt2mYiyXl6K3dl5M hdY2nQfyJRS4a5CvwOhwC6nrPpsmn2zp9ZkCQJeFqGhjkUwVudVEU59PN/pFlwu1o2Ze EGUCA5hF1qs1DGZgpSvcJjUHv6FI7LARc6qyroGNdS+doyacdNBjPthQvUQeuwnWjWPf X7V4myhgk69cfknoi8Wc9ldm1kPEsEA7hReg/HMY2LecyF6I/5IlIjbK1OkVrsOQc+IV fZaw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXsF98e8iGGm8zIM9/LEkXmONKyADAKI9sA00EdbNLKAPaNP1mW79wBLLxY9/yYGjkMT2V8e64=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwLeC0k/SNpmIAGh87aiDbC0Ngjhu37wA6vEY1g50ZzizO+Pgiw YuGwa8pKT5CFoO1V1ecXLPdTY9T95TJu8TnSyCL5+cCScL6MlFE/GMZuCMtvl+oUz+Ovq4cjdOE 9gb3N6P+APzqwboRueJf/ZH/JMO2GWszU3DtCyS1tHjHEiYkIDfwdsUczuA== X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX6pU16VhCWfGlMiMksS9C/GiI++9iWt62Pj0hNa0NphZEkTN9W8jpwTEiID0ea aBRo9srFqbs8MEzJxWm6USNxZmdEqUWJztnIUIvGKa02y3GhE4pdPerwHOCWlSTLoorCXgAHbxB EuFTzyFGvdhqE9ylfPU7VL9jhMwXRcvVt3dWWXQLVM3zWVF0Yx8W0SnczxN3BO57RyBhd1Ye4yE jZhaiE10v4jqHVOOOYY4CVrFFyaZUFmG1WCiclWmvGJYMITZlgtQaOv+CQ1msBxUS1Ab9B9zXxw MmL+oQL6idkxft107mdhe1njSZ+jk5F8qrmcoVzVSyYq2FwkEEqf7GnQ1Gxe1rzlLTX0NK6naRF FoWxBZuc8RLS5hSDQ66wFfhCxSymjt1U= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3484:b0:46e:7e22:ff6a with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-47d84b1fd4bmr245380685e9.15.1768290419754; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 23:46:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEvSNMQrQFrG/2aS7V7uD8HByGcK0PJXoWEI3qRop/CiFvA7kKclL+qqFUyulC9Y6/d4JjGpA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3484:b0:46e:7e22:ff6a with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-47d84b1fd4bmr245380335e9.15.1768290419267; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 23:46:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from redhat.com (IGLD-80-230-35-22.inter.net.il. [80.230.35.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-47ed9eb6fbesm9228355e9.4.2026.01.12.23.46.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Jan 2026 23:46:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 02:46:54 -0500 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Bobby Eshleman Cc: Stefano Garzarella , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Stefan Hajnoczi , Jason Wang , Eugenio =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9rez?= , Xuan Zhuo , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Wei Liu , Dexuan Cui , Bryan Tan , Vishnu Dasa , Broadcom internal kernel review list , Shuah Khan , Long Li , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, berrange@redhat.com, Sargun Dhillon , Bobby Eshleman Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v13 02/13] vsock: add netns to vsock core Message-ID: <20260113024548-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20251223-vsock-vmtest-v13-0-9d6db8e7c80b@meta.com> <20251223-vsock-vmtest-v13-2-9d6db8e7c80b@meta.com> <20260111013536-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 03:34:31PM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 01:43:37AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 04:28:36PM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > From: Bobby Eshleman > > > > > > Add netns logic to vsock core. Additionally, modify transport hook > > > prototypes to be used by later transport-specific patches (e.g., > > > *_seqpacket_allow()). > > > > > > Namespaces are supported primarily by changing socket lookup functions > > > (e.g., vsock_find_connected_socket()) to take into account the socket > > > namespace and the namespace mode before considering a candidate socket a > > > "match". > > > > > > This patch also introduces the sysctl /proc/sys/net/vsock/ns_mode to > > > report the mode and /proc/sys/net/vsock/child_ns_mode to set the mode > > > for new namespaces. > > > > > > Add netns functionality (initialization, passing to transports, procfs, > > > etc...) to the af_vsock socket layer. Later patches that add netns > > > support to transports depend on this patch. > > > > > > dgram_allow(), stream_allow(), and seqpacket_allow() callbacks are > > > modified to take a vsk in order to perform logic on namespace modes. In > > > future patches, the net will also be used for socket > > > lookups in these functions. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman > > > > ... > > > > > > > static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > > > struct sockaddr_vm *addr) > > > { > > > + struct net *net = sock_net(sk_vsock(vsk)); > > > static u32 port; > > > struct sockaddr_vm new_addr; > > > > > > > > > Hmm this static port gives me pause. So some port number info leaks > > between namespaces. I am not saying it's a big security issue > > and yet ... people expect isolation. > > Probably the easiest solution is making it per-ns, my quick rough draft > looks like this: Sounds like a plan. > diff --git a/include/net/netns/vsock.h b/include/net/netns/vsock.h > index e2325e2d6ec5..b34d69a22fa8 100644 > --- a/include/net/netns/vsock.h > +++ b/include/net/netns/vsock.h > @@ -11,6 +11,10 @@ enum vsock_net_mode { > > struct netns_vsock { > struct ctl_table_header *sysctl_hdr; > + > + /* protected by the vsock_table_lock in af_vsock.c */ > + u32 port; > + > enum vsock_net_mode mode; > enum vsock_net_mode child_ns_mode; > }; > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > index 9d614e4a4fa5..cd2a47140134 100644 > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > @@ -748,11 +748,10 @@ static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > struct sockaddr_vm *addr) > { > struct net *net = sock_net(sk_vsock(vsk)); > - static u32 port; > struct sockaddr_vm new_addr; > > - if (!port) > - port = get_random_u32_above(LAST_RESERVED_PORT); > + if (!net->vsock.port) > + net->vsock.port = get_random_u32_above(LAST_RESERVED_PORT); > > vsock_addr_init(&new_addr, addr->svm_cid, addr->svm_port); > > @@ -761,11 +760,11 @@ static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > unsigned int i; > > for (i = 0; i < MAX_PORT_RETRIES; i++) { > - if (port == VMADDR_PORT_ANY || > - port <= LAST_RESERVED_PORT) > - port = LAST_RESERVED_PORT + 1; > + if (net->vsock.port == VMADDR_PORT_ANY || > + net->vsock.port <= LAST_RESERVED_PORT) > + net->vsock.port = LAST_RESERVED_PORT + 1; > > - new_addr.svm_port = port++; > + new_addr.svm_port = net->vsock.port++; > > if (!__vsock_find_bound_socket_net(&new_addr, net)) { > found = true; > > > > Not as nice, but not necessarily horrid. WDYT? > > Best, > Bobby I wouldn't call static vars "nice". LGTM.