From: Raju Rangoju <Raju.Rangoju@amd.com>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <pabeni@redhat.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <edumazet@google.com>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
<Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>, Vishal Badole <Vishal.Badole@amd.com>,
Raju Rangoju <Raju.Rangoju@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v3] xgbe: Use netlink extack to report errors to ethtool
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 13:33:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260114080357.1778132-1-Raju.Rangoju@amd.com> (raw)
From: Vishal Badole <Vishal.Badole@amd.com>
Upgrade XGBE driver to report errors via netlink extack instead
of netdev_error so ethtool userspace can be aware of failures.
Signed-off-by: Vishal Badole <Vishal.Badole@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Raju Rangoju <Raju.Rangoju@amd.com>
---
Changes since v2:
- Add missing Signed-off-by tag
Changes since v1:
- Remove \n at the end of the extack string
- Don't use _FMT if there's no formatting going on
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-ethtool.c | 49 +++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-ethtool.c
index 0d19b09497a0..46b69166e74a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-ethtool.c
@@ -362,13 +362,16 @@ static int xgbe_set_coalesce(struct net_device *netdev,
/* Check the bounds of values for Rx */
if (rx_riwt > XGMAC_MAX_DMA_RIWT) {
- netdev_err(netdev, "rx-usec is limited to %d usecs\n",
- hw_if->riwt_to_usec(pdata, XGMAC_MAX_DMA_RIWT));
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+ "rx-usec is limited to %d usecs",
+ hw_if->riwt_to_usec(pdata,
+ XGMAC_MAX_DMA_RIWT));
return -EINVAL;
}
if (rx_frames > pdata->rx_desc_count) {
- netdev_err(netdev, "rx-frames is limited to %d frames\n",
- pdata->rx_desc_count);
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+ "rx-frames is limited to %d frames",
+ pdata->rx_desc_count);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -377,8 +380,7 @@ static int xgbe_set_coalesce(struct net_device *netdev,
/* Check the bounds of values for Tx */
if (!tx_usecs) {
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
- "tx-usecs must not be 0");
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "tx-usecs must not be 0");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (tx_usecs > XGMAC_MAX_COAL_TX_TICK) {
@@ -387,8 +389,9 @@ static int xgbe_set_coalesce(struct net_device *netdev,
return -EINVAL;
}
if (tx_frames > pdata->tx_desc_count) {
- netdev_err(netdev, "tx-frames is limited to %d frames\n",
- pdata->tx_desc_count);
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+ "tx-frames is limited to %d frames",
+ pdata->tx_desc_count);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -474,7 +477,7 @@ static int xgbe_set_rxfh(struct net_device *netdev,
if (rxfh->hfunc != ETH_RSS_HASH_NO_CHANGE &&
rxfh->hfunc != ETH_RSS_HASH_TOP) {
- netdev_err(netdev, "unsupported hash function\n");
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "unsupported hash function");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
@@ -561,37 +564,39 @@ static int xgbe_set_ringparam(struct net_device *netdev,
unsigned int rx, tx;
if (ringparam->rx_mini_pending || ringparam->rx_jumbo_pending) {
- netdev_err(netdev, "unsupported ring parameter\n");
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "unsupported ring parameter");
return -EINVAL;
}
if ((ringparam->rx_pending < XGBE_RX_DESC_CNT_MIN) ||
(ringparam->rx_pending > XGBE_RX_DESC_CNT_MAX)) {
- netdev_err(netdev,
- "rx ring parameter must be between %u and %u\n",
- XGBE_RX_DESC_CNT_MIN, XGBE_RX_DESC_CNT_MAX);
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+ "rx ring parameter must be between %u and %u",
+ XGBE_RX_DESC_CNT_MIN,
+ XGBE_RX_DESC_CNT_MAX);
return -EINVAL;
}
if ((ringparam->tx_pending < XGBE_TX_DESC_CNT_MIN) ||
(ringparam->tx_pending > XGBE_TX_DESC_CNT_MAX)) {
- netdev_err(netdev,
- "tx ring parameter must be between %u and %u\n",
- XGBE_TX_DESC_CNT_MIN, XGBE_TX_DESC_CNT_MAX);
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+ "tx ring parameter must be between %u and %u",
+ XGBE_TX_DESC_CNT_MIN,
+ XGBE_TX_DESC_CNT_MAX);
return -EINVAL;
}
rx = __rounddown_pow_of_two(ringparam->rx_pending);
if (rx != ringparam->rx_pending)
- netdev_notice(netdev,
- "rx ring parameter rounded to power of two: %u\n",
- rx);
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+ "rx ring parameter rounded to power of two: %u",
+ rx);
tx = __rounddown_pow_of_two(ringparam->tx_pending);
if (tx != ringparam->tx_pending)
- netdev_notice(netdev,
- "tx ring parameter rounded to power of two: %u\n",
- tx);
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+ "tx ring parameter rounded to power of two: %u",
+ tx);
if ((rx == pdata->rx_desc_count) &&
(tx == pdata->tx_desc_count))
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-01-14 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-14 8:03 Raju Rangoju [this message]
2026-01-16 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next v3] xgbe: Use netlink extack to report errors to ethtool Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-16 4:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260114080357.1778132-1-Raju.Rangoju@amd.com \
--to=raju.rangoju@amd.com \
--cc=Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com \
--cc=Vishal.Badole@amd.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox