From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02D3225DAEA; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 23:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768432429; cv=none; b=BnvCX+c5WfZZSy56DAHbEUncPD8H7D4/37wjLpM6cox8ZNXXWQRAikcVda4v2h427Q94rnVwCBf0RaxOkC0MQCwU/Io7JoQxTKqHSFm6vs7miUofM3jYWeoijTHQb471ftg2ya/3nWF1bctRhS/o9i4RcGZ9V8PEVYK+3qUzwSg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768432429; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nrrLtRfi4zqtezZNYT9fL1ylm1cmz713dBfa6hDFuXY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lpmFsgCuLEbiRzDvWbaP4URu9TDaIao1ly6QRr2KsDXoCU0GjPGUwrwefMA+GUnTRhSpzT3aFzphiPvxyf16nV+Jzk0jYfPA1rvEpAagiflFx4Ot3j2HQQmOjYqHpEK2HwjPm2DD0+o8rBPp4u3tCGOXy0owoiHvKAaojVEPISg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=tKpGzxOk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="tKpGzxOk" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 430E8C4CEF7; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 23:13:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1768432428; bh=nrrLtRfi4zqtezZNYT9fL1ylm1cmz713dBfa6hDFuXY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tKpGzxOk8KWC2Bg99tlvlER8RkaAbzrC7BUZ6ghMBlcgARgJ3YziDUcCKFRMe+2wq 6fwbf+kgkcSgYn1jsz+RYYEEUk7JRQBLEd2TQLV/GRsceOlCVINvuUSxq+QiO/zxEB NGY+zXK9363DoqO1I+7pyMIPcjzPQ3YENmf4hDovKvjGA1Y5j8HIstuwBTa4lHcvID OihkKLmLmElWhSNFezRTqc7PSqORjMKnruCX58c7+6j0koAHH19zf70ZDQDljJfytM w9+tAAX3Hilz44NEYg3Rym5ff5zrhosJCtyoL9eNqvnlJ/ZTksE0a3kF/Qk2My+X1d /2JuNc6ULzQ2g== Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:13:46 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com Cc: pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, parav@nvidia.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, horms@kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org, kuniyu@google.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dave.taht@gmail.com, jhs@mojatatu.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us, davem@davemloft.net, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, donald.hunter@gmail.com, ast@fiberby.net, liuhangbin@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, ij@kernel.org, ncardwell@google.com, koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com, g.white@cablelabs.com, ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com, mirja.kuehlewind@ericsson.com, cheshire@apple.com, rs.ietf@gmx.at, Jason_Livingood@comcast.com, vidhi_goel@apple.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/1] AccECN packetdrill selftest series Message-ID: <20260114151346.734001ac@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260114162915.94820-1-chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com> References: <20260114162915.94820-1-chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:29:14 +0100 chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com wrote: > Please find the v2 AccECN packetdrill selftest patch series, which > includes 58 test cases used to verify the functionality of > Accurate ECN spec (RFC9768) under a variety of conditions. > > The used packetdrill is commit 6f2116af6b7e1936a53e80ab31b77f74abda1aaa > of the branch: https://github.com/minuscat/packetdrill_accecn Missing your own SoB on the patch, but also -- are these supposed to pass without the kernel patches? Without going back to check Paolo's message my understanding was that you'd repost this as patch 15 of the kernel series. On the packetdrill side -- is PR #61 the code we need merged? Doesn't seem like it. Could you please clean that part up and start the review process?