public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: fushuai.wang@linux.dev
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev, Jason@zx2c4.com,
	wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, wangfushuai@baidu.com
Subject: Re: [net-next,v3] wireguard: allowedips: Use kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu()
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 19:32:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260115033237.1545400-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260112130633.25563-1-fushuai.wang@linux.dev>

This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least pausible.

For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
---
wireguard: allowedips: Use kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu()

This commit replaces call_rcu() with a custom kmem_cache_free() callback
with kfree_rcu() to simplify the code. The change affects how nodes are
freed in the remove_node() function.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c b/drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c
> index 09f7fcd7da78..5ece9acad64d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c
> @@ -48,11 +48,6 @@ static void push_rcu(struct allowedips_node **stack,
>  	}
>  }
>
> -static void node_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> -{
> -	kmem_cache_free(node_cache, container_of(rcu, struct allowedips_node, rcu));
> -}
> -

[ ... ]

> @@ -271,13 +266,13 @@ static void remove_node(struct allowedips_node *node, struct mutex *lock)
>  	if (free_parent)
>  		child = rcu_dereference_protected(parent->bit[!(node->parent_bit_packed & 1)],
>  						  lockdep_is_held(lock));
> -	call_rcu(&node->rcu, node_free_rcu);
> +	kfree_rcu(node, rcu);

Does wg_allowedips_slab_uninit() need to be updated to use
kvfree_rcu_barrier() instead of rcu_barrier()?

When CONFIG_KVFREE_RCU_BATCHED is enabled (the default), kfree_rcu()
uses a batched mechanism that queues work via queue_rcu_work(). The
rcu_barrier() call waits for RCU callbacks to complete, but these
callbacks only queue the actual free to a workqueue via rcu_work_rcufn().
The workqueue work that calls kvfree() may still be pending after
rcu_barrier() returns.

The existing cleanup path is:
  wg_allowedips_slab_uninit() -> rcu_barrier() -> kmem_cache_destroy()

With kfree_rcu(), this sequence could destroy the slab cache while
kfree_rcu_work() still has pending frees queued. The proper barrier for
kfree_rcu() is kvfree_rcu_barrier() which also calls flush_rcu_work()
on all pending batches.

>  	if (!free_parent)
>  		return;
>  	if (child)
>  		child->parent_bit_packed = parent->parent_bit_packed;
>  	*(struct allowedips_node **)(parent->parent_bit_packed & ~3UL) = child;
> -	call_rcu(&parent->rcu, node_free_rcu);
> +	kfree_rcu(parent, rcu);
>  }
-- 
pw-bot: cr

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-15  3:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-12 13:06 [PATCH net-next v3] wireguard: allowedips: Use kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu() Fushuai Wang
2026-01-14 15:41 ` Simon Horman
2026-01-15  3:32 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-01-15  5:12   ` Fushuai Wang
2026-01-15  9:15     ` Eric Dumazet
2026-01-15 14:33       ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2026-01-15 14:40         ` Eric Dumazet
2026-01-22 23:30           ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2026-01-15  8:12   ` [net-next, " Petr Vaněk
2026-01-15 14:26     ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260115033237.1545400-1-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fushuai.wang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    --cc=wangfushuai@baidu.com \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox