From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: daniel@makrotopia.org
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
fchan@maxlinear.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com,
jpovazanec@maxlinear.com, yweng@maxlinear.com,
davem@davemloft.net, andrew@lunn.ch, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
edumazet@google.com, ajayaraman@maxlinear.com, john@phrozen.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
lrosu@maxlinear.com, bxu@maxlinear.com, pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next] net: phy: intel-xway: workaround stale LEDs before link-up
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2026 18:29:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260118022907.1106701-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d70a1fa9b92c7b3e7ea09b5c3216d77a8fd35265.1768432653.git.daniel@makrotopia.org>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
---
net: phy: intel-xway: workaround stale LEDs before link-up
This patch works around a PHY firmware bug where LED manual control and
polarity configuration have no effect until a link is detected. The fix
temporarily clears BMCR_ANENABLE for 100ms to force the LED thread to start.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/intel-xway.c b/drivers/net/phy/intel-xway.c
> index 9766dd99afaa..e06ed7ab0ff3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/intel-xway.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/intel-xway.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -286,8 +287,33 @@ static int xway_gphy_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
> return err;
>
> /* Use default LED configuration if 'leds' node isn't defined */
> - if (!of_get_child_by_name(np, "leds"))
> + if (!of_get_child_by_name(np, "leds")) {
> xway_gphy_init_leds(phydev);
> + } else {
Does this leak the device_node reference returned by of_get_child_by_name()?
The API documentation states that of_get_child_by_name() returns a node
pointer with refcount incremented, requiring of_node_put() when done.
When the "leds" node exists, the returned pointer is never captured and
of_node_put() is never called.
Other PHY drivers handle this correctly, for example vsc85xx_probe_common()
in drivers/net/phy/mscc/mscc_main.c:
np = of_get_child_by_name(phydev->mdio.dev.of_node, "leds");
if (np) {
of_node_put(np);
...
}
And of_phy_leds() in drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c also properly calls
of_node_put(leds) on all exit paths.
Note that this leak also existed in the original code before this patch,
but since this patch is touching this exact code path, it would be a good
opportunity to fix it.
--
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-18 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-15 23:40 [PATCH net-next] net: phy: intel-xway: workaround stale LEDs before link-up Daniel Golle
2026-01-16 1:23 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-01-16 2:06 ` Daniel Golle
2026-01-18 2:29 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-01-18 2:31 ` [net-next] " Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-18 2:33 ` Daniel Golle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260118022907.1106701-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=ajayaraman@maxlinear.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bxu@maxlinear.com \
--cc=daniel@makrotopia.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fchan@maxlinear.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=john@phrozen.org \
--cc=jpovazanec@maxlinear.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=lrosu@maxlinear.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=yweng@maxlinear.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox