From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D45E33E35B for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 19:12:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768849942; cv=none; b=BbinOHwRQLnJbiilT9FTxNHBOZcNRuxQ/7CjVcOxaNLCq2lrOXmYJBG2p0lKqL69wmjtbMx1sgBhgseyWEyZ9bk/JOHOEROSWlAil/aiRpfgNK5yhVVdGqXJWnowwWtkRIQ7BQZtBBdZ9f0deKUEgyRGFGjm93MYXz1mdN+KbQM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768849942; c=relaxed/simple; bh=D+hn1fjq0T00MiWxSUcRJZwg1tPBcmQyhiIKedIeY9M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RSVS9qgtEiU5Xaqq5X2/Xx5pBBUT5S58ZNoGpByO299t5ond9qh5h0aObuypOP5IQA9lOszn/kv1PGFBJaPfahYyfm0jLR/ZKysYyThjLTBV5tqg8GkTbJLIy665Vcs6hscNfiKFillXAvRAQSwV/lpMt9LUI56nV9zderI5YA8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jSjMZj/S; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jSjMZj/S" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C9C8C2BCAF; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 19:12:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1768849941; bh=D+hn1fjq0T00MiWxSUcRJZwg1tPBcmQyhiIKedIeY9M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jSjMZj/SVleu58Kr1BP9AHcr2Pfv/Rea321IAGbeVXT5NsdQfmODgMPB+9+8E8/Xn VDyWWGKGAfxSQpYJdcrcPZrC72EGi3Amu1taBsj92+aOLCaLdApMHzobR1X5z6/6Tf aGJd1qmWecIRuhlz12iEseCe6s949bN/mq563wYVV/r0v8f0j0MmqMwida0LJybtdP RvInQCsqYvlTl2fMsR1XqxQ8LgkZzcTBYbZiyFG/fTNVSYa93ektrD3wAvsv+VV+1N kVNu4mEPWrwRx/L8xHYvnExoLJLRRWOQpTEjedbFMrBxy4nODhZleMwg/humqDEakQ ZxAnvMNw4/xfA== Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 11:12:20 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Paul Moses Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 0/3] act_gate fixes and gate selftest update Message-ID: <20260119111220.04f7610c@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260116112522.159480-1-p@1g4.org> <20260119103251.41eb61aa@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 18:50:08 +0000 Paul Moses wrote: > The big question currently is what is appropriate for stable. I do > not believe it's possible to fix this issue without negatively > impacting the performance of the gate without either using a unlock =E2= =86=92 > cancel =E2=86=92 relock pattern or conversion to RCU. Neither of which is > ideal for stable, so more constructive input is needed. The conversion to RCU looks like a solid choice and I think it's acceptable for stable. Let me send you a couple of trivial comments on patch 2, hopefully once CCed the authors can provide deeper review.