From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Michal Michalik <michal.michalik@intel.com>,
Milena Olech <milena.olech@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH net] dpll: Prevent duplicate registrations
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 14:00:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260121130012.112606-1-ivecera@redhat.com> (raw)
Modify the internal registration helpers dpll_xa_ref_{dpll,pin}_add()
to reject duplicate registration attempts.
Previously, if a caller attempted to register the same pin multiple
times (with the same ops, priv, and cookie) on the same device, the core
silently increments the reference count and return success. This behavior
is incorrect because if the caller makes these duplicate registrations
then for the first one dpll_pin_registration is allocated and for others
the associated dpll_pin_ref.refcount is incremented. During the first
unregistration the associated dpll_pin_registration is freed and for
others WARN is fired.
Fix this by updating the logic to return `-EEXIST` if a matching
registration is found to enforce a strict "register once" policy.
Fixes: 9431063ad323 ("dpll: core: Add DPLL framework base functions")
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
---
drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c | 12 ++++--------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
index a461095efd8a..8879a7235156 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
@@ -83,10 +83,8 @@ dpll_xa_ref_pin_add(struct xarray *xa_pins, struct dpll_pin *pin,
if (ref->pin != pin)
continue;
reg = dpll_pin_registration_find(ref, ops, priv, cookie);
- if (reg) {
- refcount_inc(&ref->refcount);
- return 0;
- }
+ if (reg)
+ return -EEXIST;
ref_exists = true;
break;
}
@@ -164,10 +162,8 @@ dpll_xa_ref_dpll_add(struct xarray *xa_dplls, struct dpll_device *dpll,
if (ref->dpll != dpll)
continue;
reg = dpll_pin_registration_find(ref, ops, priv, cookie);
- if (reg) {
- refcount_inc(&ref->refcount);
- return 0;
- }
+ if (reg)
+ return -EEXIST;
ref_exists = true;
break;
}
--
2.52.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-01-21 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-21 13:00 Ivan Vecera [this message]
2026-01-21 13:37 ` [PATCH net] dpll: Prevent duplicate registrations Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2026-01-21 17:18 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2026-01-22 16:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260121130012.112606-1-ivecera@redhat.com \
--to=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.michalik@intel.com \
--cc=milena.olech@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox