From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BCDB34CFD6; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 03:41:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769053298; cv=none; b=QwQTIPo961QCVjm0vY5Uc5XUAvMw/CGOWssVDJgjKX1Bx0Ha7DfkmDuO5irGxqN8nfk8Mwed1ePyR1+AmBblyke5243cVtc8y/pZ0FtwE0ha1SGMfJ9aslb1bjxOgqv+t01Rllbv9LqGX1ORY0kG7mZ/X+ycLE6o68sKKZplZjE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769053298; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fQn73AMtLykAtIbLfz754K7IjrqMh6xwHuQUkv3q07Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nRobrXiLTEGJH+eGN4OjtiseFBz6ExApFzX6AYcE6ad25f4XvgD9RuVA4dFSjD0/O6dNgQkRO6fE5TkknnQyrTli3q+lYOetpxt4mP1eBN7eJoXqUHOQAeodD1yQSNkhV5slDRf2cansqliFKoEeW/VAUf0Yed6DVzRmDKd6VLI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VZt6Tbha; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VZt6Tbha" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76E56C116C6; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 03:41:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1769053297; bh=fQn73AMtLykAtIbLfz754K7IjrqMh6xwHuQUkv3q07Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=VZt6TbhaNMFnQUPH6VMQSSy4AY3T3m0yjxWcvzn/VJSjG/ekyR2N5WuJ1I77RoIeV UFxPvfj7KmKeZUvhEf2U+MSJbybnri/tGUIEKRvVLJRFjsT/5PK+T/USLsIiEI3Ubp rTV3QsEI1Z8DxpsYVh2htQANMvCMKPUwtAXmcIcguZG0Ju+IUfwGD0Rf2A6TPIq7T/ GG42s5OMkxFqZ2apTXC+5L1RIJrMKr7o7I3+j7jhyFPJRANYFxkRBe9Hk4sfdYBwG/ CDdIVQ9yDsg+jDNuWTQQ7qfteH+h0nw26S0Qreo6yZx3FryiiVGWkwWVML8KpayD/I 7ubVMGLwPk1hg== Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 19:41:35 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: tariqt@nvidia.com Cc: cratiu@nvidia.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, cjubran@nvidia.com, davem@davemloft.net, horms@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, mbloch@nvidia.com, moshe@nvidia.com, jiri@nvidia.com, edumazet@google.com, gal@nvidia.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, donald.hunter@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us, krzk@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, leon@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net Subject: Re: [net-next,V5,10/15] net/mlx5: Add a shared devlink instance for PFs on same chip Message-ID: <20260121194135.6737b36f@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260122033959.2579113-1-kuba@kernel.org> References: <1768895878-1637182-11-git-send-email-tariqt@nvidia.com> <20260122033959.2579113-1-kuba@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 21 Jan 2026 19:39:59 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > +int mlx5_shd_init(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev) > > +{ > > + u8 *vpd_data __free(kfree) = NULL; > > The __free(kfree) annotation here combined with the early return below > looks problematic. __free() should be considered banned for netdev. Please. It clearly adds more bugs than it fixes.