From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B557D42EECA; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 15:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769095317; cv=none; b=myCWCOf2nZnL9RQeEBS9L+1Sc/lNYPFoRaKGzGVN4yZsLRb2JuIKAUNB3J8+RYCOCPKc2vqseX/xObL4NULS9cD9Q/5A3NedrRkO925YYGwSohfkGxtm1Xgxu4sklFCKASyZ9xeSksZ4NYaDK5BztgLmM8djHYLrhMFOn44gqd8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769095317; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fwpmgVUXri5YJxqIoDiQocbzg0KS4OrbIq1DkS/Is+k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LVVPXbpfDZGcVo/h+ejLqG7jRMvERK68Ge8jEJOkxwMZWoIc6TkUS+d8pQKnZm2VPEejphPD3E3cDNKS8sQ052vgWWfQOAjd50mjNq9ldk9cDv9hn8eQaGhn9SBGqAc8r94GkhIztyZtY10h0nRRrB+26oWhrh7NmBlDE6M4P0s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=tQAGHHIM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="tQAGHHIM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B87A5C116C6; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 15:21:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1769095317; bh=fwpmgVUXri5YJxqIoDiQocbzg0KS4OrbIq1DkS/Is+k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tQAGHHIMzB9WcQE27vfzfIRbYqNlMQrlvWTTr+uKZloRwixX+DMO23zWMKPWvs4rT CwFARhm21WmSrKMkOfPfI2JQtVA6hhWtQFQ+PrJxLCoxOu+/JM0Hk9DjV9cNYzTjf7 ZCP504UdDnfqpnV+gxuEIcHrwjBqSM2QAitJto5CTs11JAyKj+GFT5PpQ6xjOhTXtq XLORuE6mNK63vtH3GTolDFHJ2Mhpr9x0BZ4ft+R/+/+7zsAZO8FjR2sFkgqIkzm7pO Z5WHCOiSH8PL5482jxCfStGNPNEd6KGT9iwWdP4ZttsLcaUadpn5IG1DUx0jYlw//E x7JJkLJ6C0qEA== Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 07:21:55 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Yangfl Cc: Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter , David Laight Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/3] net: dsa: yt921x: Fix MIB overflow wraparound routine Message-ID: <20260122072155.127f0c78@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260118013019.1078847-1-mmyangfl@gmail.com> <20260118013019.1078847-2-mmyangfl@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 22 Jan 2026 21:19:29 +0800 Yangfl wrote: > > Why targeting net-next here? the blamed commit is already in Linus'tree > > and it looks like the above could causes functional issues, ad the wrong > > value is written into the mib. > > > > I think this should go via net. > > There are following patches which are not fully suitable for net tree, > and the issue does not block the main functionality, only gives wrong > statistics. > > Should the whole series be sent to net, or split into two parts? Split into two parts please (and the second one posted after net is merged back into net-next).