From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
michael.chan@broadcom.com, sdf@fomichev.me,
almasrymina@google.com, asml.silence@gmail.com, dw@davidwei.uk,
daniel@iogearbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/6] net: use netdev_queue_config() for mp restart
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 07:46:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260122074602.3c41e8c1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb985b09-fe29-4fc9-9c06-310ff3abfad1@nvidia.com>
On Thu, 22 Jan 2026 16:06:40 +0100 Dragos Tatulea wrote:
> > @@ -195,8 +199,11 @@ void __net_mp_close_rxq(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int ifq_idx,
> > rxq->mp_params.mp_priv != old_p->mp_priv))
> > return;
> >
> > + netdev_queue_config(dev, ifq_idx, &qcfg[0]);
> > memset(&rxq->mp_params, 0, sizeof(rxq->mp_params));
> > - err = netdev_rx_queue_restart(dev, ifq_idx);
> > + netdev_queue_config(dev, ifq_idx, &qcfg[1]);
> > +
> Is it ok to assume that on close we always resume to the default?
> For now yes but maybe in the future we might want to save qcfg to the
> state before mp_open.
When we add the ability to configure the params via Netlink we should
insert another chunk into [__]netdev_queue_config().
netdev_queue_config() should evaluate the config in reverse order of
priority, so:
- get defaults
- get device-level config
- get per-queue config
- get MP overrides
On close we are clearing the MP overrides, since we don't have
per-queue config we revert to defaults (as you say). But once there's
some overlap with device or per-queue configs we'll go back to the next
level of config in order of priority.
Did I understand the question right?
FWIW I think something that'd be a major usability win would be to make
MP presence imply per-queue HDS threshold of 0 automatically. So that'd
probably be first on my list of knobs to extend the "priority" model to.
> With the very first rx-buf-len series it was possible to set a
> rx-buf-len via YNL for a normal queue, switch to a MP queue and then
> on MP queue close the configuration got switched to the default value
> of rx-buf-len instead of what the user had configured. This was
> not convenient.
Yes, not sure IIUC, but the fact that clearing the MP didn't
automatically delete the MP-related setting was the main reason
we ditched the full qcfg for this use case.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-22 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-22 0:51 [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: restore the structure of driver-facing qcfg API Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-22 0:51 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] eth: bnxt: always set the queue mgmt ops Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-22 8:04 ` Subbaraya Sundeep
2026-01-22 15:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-22 16:31 ` Subbaraya Sundeep
2026-01-22 0:51 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] net: introduce a trivial netdev_queue_config() Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-22 8:12 ` Subbaraya Sundeep
2026-01-22 15:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-22 0:51 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] net: move mp->rx_page_size validation to __net_mp_open_rxq() Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-22 0:51 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] net: use netdev_queue_config() for mp restart Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-22 15:06 ` Dragos Tatulea
2026-01-22 15:46 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-01-22 16:28 ` Dragos Tatulea
2026-01-23 1:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-22 0:51 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] net: add queue config validation callback Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-22 0:51 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] eth: bnxt: plug bnxt_validate_qcfg() into qops Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-23 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: restore the structure of driver-facing qcfg API patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260122074602.3c41e8c1@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox