Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 01/15] net: mdio-regmap: permit working with non-MMIO regmaps

[Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>]

On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 04:38:37PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 03:47:04PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 02:13:01PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > > +	unsigned int base;
> > > > 
> > > > Hmm... resource_size_t ?
> 
> > > Well, regmap_read() takes "unsigned int reg".
> > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18.6/source/include/linux/regmap.h#L1297
> > > So in practice, a truncation will be done somewhere if the register base
> > > exceeds unsigned int storage capacity. But I didn't feel that it's worth
> > > handling that.
> > 
> > Would this address your feedback?
> 
> Yes and no. See my remarks below.
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-regmap.c b/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-regmap.c
> > index 2a0e9c519fa3..416ff4e13e8f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-regmap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-regmap.c
> > @@ -67,8 +67,15 @@ struct mii_bus *devm_mdio_regmap_register(struct device *dev,
> >  	mr = mii->priv;
> >  	mr->regmap = config->regmap;
> >  	mr->valid_addr = config->valid_addr;
> > -	if (config->resource)
> > +	if (config->resource) {
> 
> Btw, this might be not enough, one should check size and flags as well
> before use. There was a discussion about this recently. Maybe we should
> just move to a simple unsigned int in the config for now? Because handling
> resources maybe considered as over engineering in this case.

The resource flags are never taken into consideration, but I can for
sure replace the resource in struct mdio_regmap_config with just an
unsigned int start and an end, but that doesn't get rid of the resource
usage. The dev_get_resource(dev->parent, NULL) call is how we learn of
where our register window is located in the "one big regmap" provided by
the parent (SJA1105). So we still need this check somewhere else if we
wanted to not fail silently in case of address bits truncation.

> > +		if (config->resource->start > U32_MAX ||
> > +		    config->resource->end > U32_MAX) {
> 
> Ideally it should be resource_overlaps() check. But see above.

resource_overlaps_with_what? The only problem is that the resource can
exceed the 32 bit representation that regmap works with.

> > +			dev_err(config->parent,
> > +				"Resource exceeds regmap API addressing possibilities\n");
> > +			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > +		}
> >  		mr->base = config->resource->start;
> > +	}
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> 
>