From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
petrm@nvidia.com, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com,
shuah@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, idosch@nvidia.com,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, edumazet@google.com,
donald.hunter@gmail.com, razor@blackwall.org, kuba@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v5,net-next,08/10] geneve: extract hint option at GRO stage
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 17:53:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260123175313.1286366-1-horms@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cd0e9dc42ba83f388b604097cffe268ffcb53351.1769011015.git.pabeni@redhat.com>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
---
geneve: extract hint option at GRO stage
This patch adds helpers for finding and validating a GRO hint option in
the geneve header and uses them to extract hint info at the GRO stage.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/geneve.c b/drivers/net/geneve.c
> index a4c23240d9e3..2e1f85b8af4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/geneve.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/geneve.c
[ ... ]
> +static unsigned int
> +geneve_opt_gro_hint_off(const struct genevehdr *gh, __be16 *type,
> + unsigned int *gh_len)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + *type = proto_id_map[id];
> + *gh_len += gro_hint->nested_hdr_len;
> +
> + return (void *)gro_hint - (void *)gh;
> +}
[ ... ]
> @@ -541,13 +700,13 @@ static struct sk_buff *geneve_gro_receive(struct sock *sk,
> struct list_head *head,
> struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> + unsigned int hlen, gh_len, off_gnv, hint_off;
[ ... ]
> + /* The GRO hint/nested hdr could use a different ethernet type. */
> + hint_off = geneve_sk_gro_hint_off(sk, gh, &type, &gh_len);
When geneve_sk_gro_hint_off() succeeds (hint_off != 0), gh_len is increased
by nested_hdr_len. The current packet is then validated for this larger
size via skb_gro_header().
> + if (hint_off) {
> + const struct geneve_opt_gro_hint *gro_hint;
> +
> + /*
> + * If the hint is present, and nested hdr validation fails, do
> + * not attempt plain GRO: it will ignore inner hdrs and cause
> + * OoO.
> + */
> + gh = skb_gro_header(skb, off_gnv + gh_len, off_gnv);
> + if (unlikely(!gh))
> + goto out;
> +
> + gro_hint = geneve_opt_gro_hint(gh, hint_off);
> + if (!geneve_opt_gro_hint_validate_csum(skb, gh, gro_hint))
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> list_for_each_entry(p, head, list) {
> if (!NAPI_GRO_CB(p)->same_flow)
> continue;
>
> gh2 = (struct genevehdr *)(p->data + off_gnv);
> if (gh->opt_len != gh2->opt_len ||
> memcmp(gh, gh2, gh_len)) {
^^^^^^
When the current packet has a hint option and gh_len has been increased to
include nested_hdr_len, the memcmp reads gh_len bytes from gh2. However,
packet p in the GRO list may have been processed without a hint option
(even on the same socket, if the packet itself lacks the geneve hint
option), meaning it was only validated for geneve_hlen() bytes.
Could memcmp read beyond the validated region of packet p? The socket can
have gro_hint enabled while individual packets may or may not contain the
hint option. If p lacks the option, it was validated for a smaller size
than gh_len.
Note: this appears to be addressed in the next patch in the series
(566c51bcb23e "geneve: use GRO hint option in the RX path") which
introduces geneve_hdr_match() that recalculates gh_len = geneve_hlen(gh)
before the memcmp and handles nested header comparison separately.
> @@ -580,7 +759,6 @@ static struct sk_buff *geneve_gro_receive(struct sock *sk,
>
> skb_gro_pull(skb, gh_len);
> skb_gro_postpull_rcsum(skb, gh, gh_len);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-23 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-21 16:11 [PATCH v5 net-next 00/10] geneve: introduce double tunnel GSO/GRO support Paolo Abeni
2026-01-21 16:11 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 01/10] net: introduce mangleid_features Paolo Abeni
2026-01-21 16:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-01-23 19:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-21 16:11 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 02/10] geneve: expose gso partial features for tunnel offload Paolo Abeni
2026-01-21 16:11 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 03/10] vxlan: " Paolo Abeni
2026-01-21 16:11 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 04/10] geneve: add netlink support for GRO hint Paolo Abeni
2026-01-21 16:11 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 05/10] geneve: constify geneve_hlen() Paolo Abeni
2026-01-21 16:11 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 06/10] geneve: pass the geneve device ptr to geneve_build_skb() Paolo Abeni
2026-01-21 16:11 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 07/10] geneve: add GRO hint output path Paolo Abeni
2026-01-21 16:11 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 08/10] geneve: extract hint option at GRO stage Paolo Abeni
2026-01-22 14:57 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-01-23 17:54 ` Simon Horman
2026-01-23 17:53 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-01-21 16:11 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 09/10] geneve: use GRO hint option in the RX path Paolo Abeni
2026-01-21 16:11 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 10/10] selftests: net: tests for add double tunneling GRO/GSO Paolo Abeni
2026-01-22 10:05 ` Petr Machata
2026-01-23 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 00/10] geneve: introduce double tunnel GSO/GRO support Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-26 14:15 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-01-23 19:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260123175313.1286366-1-horms@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox