From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
To: andrii@kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
dsahern@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
jiang.biao@linux.dev, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v13 04/13] bpf: support fsession for bpf_session_is_return
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 14:19:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260124062008.8657-5-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260124062008.8657-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
If fsession exists, we will use the bit (1 << BPF_TRAMP_IS_RETURN_SHIFT)
in ((u64 *)ctx)[-1] to store the "is_return" flag.
The logic of bpf_session_is_return() for fsession is implemented in the
verifier by inline following code:
bool bpf_session_is_return(void *ctx)
{
return (((u64 *)ctx)[-1] >> BPF_TRAMP_IS_RETURN_SHIFT) & 1;
}
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
Co-developed-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
v11:
- rename BPF_TRAMP_SHIFT_IS_RETURN to BPF_TRAMP_IS_RETURN_SHIFT
v10:
- fix the wrong description of bpf_session_is_return() in commit log and
comment
- rename the prefix from BPF_TRAMP_M_ tp BPF_TRAMP_SHIFT_
- remove the definition of BPF_TRAMP_M_NR_ARGS
- use 63 for the shift of BPF_TRAMP_SHIFT_IS_RETURN
- check the program type in bpf_session_filter()
v9:
- remove the definition of bpf_fsession_is_return()
v7:
- reuse the kfunc bpf_session_is_return() instead of introduce new kfunc
v4:
- split out the bpf_fsession_cookie() to another patch
v3:
- merge the bpf_tracing_is_exit and bpf_fsession_cookie into a single
patch
v2:
- store the session flags after return value, instead of before nr_args
- inline the bpf_tracing_is_exit, as Jiri suggested
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 2 ++
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 13 +++++++++++++
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 41228b0add52..29eecd79352e 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1229,6 +1229,8 @@ enum {
#endif
};
+#define BPF_TRAMP_IS_RETURN_SHIFT 63
+
struct bpf_tramp_links {
struct bpf_tramp_link *links[BPF_MAX_TRAMP_LINKS];
int nr_links;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 0fa73d56cb8b..d04aea235a12 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -23011,6 +23011,19 @@ static int fixup_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
desc->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rdonly_cast]) {
insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1);
*cnt = 1;
+ } else if (desc->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_session_is_return] &&
+ env->prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_FSESSION) {
+ /*
+ * inline the bpf_session_is_return() for fsession:
+ * bool bpf_session_is_return(void *ctx)
+ * {
+ * return (((u64 *)ctx)[-1] >> BPF_TRAMP_IS_RETURN_SHIFT) & 1;
+ * }
+ */
+ insn_buf[0] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8);
+ insn_buf[1] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_0, BPF_TRAMP_IS_RETURN_SHIFT);
+ insn_buf[2] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1);
+ *cnt = 3;
}
if (env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].arg_prog) {
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 13f0a2de33b7..f7baeb8278ca 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -1286,7 +1286,8 @@ static bool is_kprobe_multi(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
static inline bool is_kprobe_session(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
- return prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION;
+ return prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE &&
+ prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION;
}
static inline bool is_uprobe_multi(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
@@ -1297,7 +1298,14 @@ static inline bool is_uprobe_multi(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
static inline bool is_uprobe_session(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
- return prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION;
+ return prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE &&
+ prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION;
+}
+
+static inline bool is_trace_fsession(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ return prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
+ prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_FSESSION;
}
static const struct bpf_func_proto *
@@ -3341,34 +3349,39 @@ __bpf_kfunc __u64 *bpf_session_cookie(void *ctx)
__bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
-BTF_KFUNCS_START(kprobe_multi_kfunc_set_ids)
+BTF_KFUNCS_START(session_kfunc_set_ids)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_session_is_return)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_session_cookie)
-BTF_KFUNCS_END(kprobe_multi_kfunc_set_ids)
+BTF_KFUNCS_END(session_kfunc_set_ids)
-static int bpf_kprobe_multi_filter(const struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 kfunc_id)
+static int bpf_session_filter(const struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 kfunc_id)
{
- if (!btf_id_set8_contains(&kprobe_multi_kfunc_set_ids, kfunc_id))
+ if (!btf_id_set8_contains(&session_kfunc_set_ids, kfunc_id))
return 0;
- if (!is_kprobe_session(prog) && !is_uprobe_session(prog))
+ if (!is_kprobe_session(prog) && !is_uprobe_session(prog) && !is_trace_fsession(prog))
return -EACCES;
return 0;
}
-static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kprobe_multi_kfunc_set = {
+static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_session_kfunc_set = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
- .set = &kprobe_multi_kfunc_set_ids,
- .filter = bpf_kprobe_multi_filter,
+ .set = &session_kfunc_set_ids,
+ .filter = bpf_session_filter,
};
-static int __init bpf_kprobe_multi_kfuncs_init(void)
+static int __init bpf_trace_kfuncs_init(void)
{
- return register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE, &bpf_kprobe_multi_kfunc_set);
+ int err = 0;
+
+ err = err ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE, &bpf_session_kfunc_set);
+ err = err ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, &bpf_session_kfunc_set);
+
+ return err;
}
-late_initcall(bpf_kprobe_multi_kfuncs_init);
+late_initcall(bpf_trace_kfuncs_init);
typedef int (*copy_fn_t)(void *dst, const void *src, u32 size, struct task_struct *tsk);
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-24 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-24 6:19 [PATCH bpf-next v13 00/13] bpf: fsession support Menglong Dong
2026-01-24 6:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 01/13] bpf: add " Menglong Dong
2026-01-24 6:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 02/13] bpf: use the least significant byte for the nr_args in trampoline Menglong Dong
2026-01-24 6:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 03/13] bpf: change prototype of bpf_session_{cookie,is_return} Menglong Dong
2026-01-24 6:19 ` Menglong Dong [this message]
2026-01-24 6:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 05/13] bpf: support fsession for bpf_session_cookie Menglong Dong
2026-01-24 6:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 06/13] bpf,x86: introduce emit_store_stack_imm64() for trampoline Menglong Dong
2026-01-24 6:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 07/13] bpf,x86: add fsession support for x86_64 Menglong Dong
2026-01-24 6:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 08/13] libbpf: add fsession support Menglong Dong
2026-01-24 6:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 09/13] bpftool: " Menglong Dong
2026-01-24 6:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 10/13] selftests/bpf: add testcases for fsession Menglong Dong
2026-01-24 6:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 11/13] selftests/bpf: test bpf_get_func_* " Menglong Dong
2026-01-24 6:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 12/13] selftests/bpf: add testcases for fsession cookie Menglong Dong
2026-01-24 6:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 13/13] selftests/bpf: test fsession mixed with fentry and fexit Menglong Dong
2026-01-25 3:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 00/13] bpf: fsession support patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260124062008.8657-5-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn \
--to=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiang.biao@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox