From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+f2d245f1d76bbfa50e4c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v1 net] nfc: llcp: Fix memleak in nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame().
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2026 00:59:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260125010214.1572439-1-kuniyu@google.com> (raw)
syzbot reported various memory leaks related to NFC, struct
nfc_llcp_sock, sk_buff, nfc_dev, etc. [0]
The leading log hinted that nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame() failed
to allocate skb due to sock_error(sk) being -ENXIO.
ENXIO is set by nfc_llcp_socket_release() when struct
nfc_llcp_local is destroyed by local_cleanup().
The problem is that there is no synchronisation between
nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame() and local_cleanup(), and skb
could be put into local->tx_queue after it was purged in
local_cleanup():
CPU1 CPU2
---- ----
nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame() local_cleanup()
|- do { '
|- pdu = nfc_alloc_send_skb(..., &err)
| .
| |- nfc_llcp_socket_release(local, false, ENXIO);
| |- skb_queue_purge(&local->tx_queue); |
| ' |
|- skb_queue_tail(&local->tx_queue, pdu); |
... |
|- pdu = nfc_alloc_send_skb(..., &err) |
^._________________________________.'
local_cleanup() is called for struct nfc_llcp_local only
after nfc_llcp_remove_local() unlinks it from llcp_devices.
If we hold local->tx_queue.lock then, we can synchronise
the thread and nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame().
Let's do that and check list_empty(&local->list) before
queuing skb to local->tx_queue in nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame().
[0]:
[ 56.074943][ T6096] llcp: nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame: Could not allocate PDU (error=-6)
[ 64.318868][ T5813] kmemleak: 6 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)
BUG: memory leak
unreferenced object 0xffff8881272f6800 (size 1024):
comm "syz.0.17", pid 6096, jiffies 4294942766
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
27 00 03 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 '..@............
backtrace (crc da58d84d):
kmemleak_alloc_recursive include/linux/kmemleak.h:44 [inline]
slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4979 [inline]
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:5284 [inline]
__do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:5645 [inline]
__kmalloc_noprof+0x3e3/0x6b0 mm/slub.c:5658
kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:961 [inline]
sk_prot_alloc+0x11a/0x1b0 net/core/sock.c:2239
sk_alloc+0x36/0x360 net/core/sock.c:2295
nfc_llcp_sock_alloc+0x37/0x130 net/nfc/llcp_sock.c:979
llcp_sock_create+0x71/0xd0 net/nfc/llcp_sock.c:1044
nfc_sock_create+0xc9/0xf0 net/nfc/af_nfc.c:31
__sock_create+0x1a9/0x340 net/socket.c:1605
sock_create net/socket.c:1663 [inline]
__sys_socket_create net/socket.c:1700 [inline]
__sys_socket+0xb9/0x1a0 net/socket.c:1747
__do_sys_socket net/socket.c:1761 [inline]
__se_sys_socket net/socket.c:1759 [inline]
__x64_sys_socket+0x1b/0x30 net/socket.c:1759
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xa4/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
BUG: memory leak
unreferenced object 0xffff88810fbd9800 (size 240):
comm "syz.0.17", pid 6096, jiffies 4294942850
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
68 f0 ff 08 81 88 ff ff 68 f0 ff 08 81 88 ff ff h.......h.......
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 68 2f 27 81 88 ff ff .........h/'....
backtrace (crc 6cc652b1):
kmemleak_alloc_recursive include/linux/kmemleak.h:44 [inline]
slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4979 [inline]
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:5284 [inline]
kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof+0x36f/0x5e0 mm/slub.c:5336
__alloc_skb+0x203/0x240 net/core/skbuff.c:660
alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1383 [inline]
alloc_skb_with_frags+0x69/0x3f0 net/core/skbuff.c:6671
sock_alloc_send_pskb+0x379/0x3e0 net/core/sock.c:2965
sock_alloc_send_skb include/net/sock.h:1859 [inline]
nfc_alloc_send_skb+0x45/0x80 net/nfc/core.c:724
nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame+0x162/0x360 net/nfc/llcp_commands.c:766
llcp_sock_sendmsg+0x14c/0x1d0 net/nfc/llcp_sock.c:814
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:727 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:742 [inline]
__sys_sendto+0x2d8/0x2f0 net/socket.c:2244
__do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2251 [inline]
__se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2247 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendto+0x28/0x30 net/socket.c:2247
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xa4/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Fixes: 94f418a20664 ("NFC: UI frame sending routine implementation")
Reported-by: syzbot+f2d245f1d76bbfa50e4c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/697569c7.a00a0220.33ccc7.0014.GAE@google.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
---
net/nfc/llcp_commands.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
net/nfc/llcp_core.c | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp_commands.c b/net/nfc/llcp_commands.c
index e2680a3bef79..b652323bc2c1 100644
--- a/net/nfc/llcp_commands.c
+++ b/net/nfc/llcp_commands.c
@@ -778,8 +778,23 @@ int nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(struct nfc_llcp_sock *sock, u8 ssap, u8 dsap,
if (likely(frag_len > 0))
skb_put_data(pdu, msg_ptr, frag_len);
+ spin_lock(&local->tx_queue.lock);
+
+ if (list_empty(&local->list)) {
+ spin_unlock(&local->tx_queue.lock);
+
+ kfree_skb(pdu);
+
+ len -= remaining_len;
+ if (len == 0)
+ len = -ENXIO;
+ break;
+ }
+
/* No need to check for the peer RW for UI frames */
- skb_queue_tail(&local->tx_queue, pdu);
+ __skb_queue_tail(&local->tx_queue, pdu);
+
+ spin_unlock(&local->tx_queue.lock);
remaining_len -= frag_len;
msg_ptr += frag_len;
diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp_core.c b/net/nfc/llcp_core.c
index beeb3b4d28ca..444a3774c8e8 100644
--- a/net/nfc/llcp_core.c
+++ b/net/nfc/llcp_core.c
@@ -316,7 +316,9 @@ static struct nfc_llcp_local *nfc_llcp_remove_local(struct nfc_dev *dev)
spin_lock(&llcp_devices_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(local, tmp, &llcp_devices, list)
if (local->dev == dev) {
- list_del(&local->list);
+ spin_lock(&local->tx_queue.lock);
+ list_del_init(&local->list);
+ spin_unlock(&local->tx_queue.lock);
spin_unlock(&llcp_devices_lock);
return local;
}
--
2.52.0.457.g6b5491de43-goog
next reply other threads:[~2026-01-25 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-25 0:59 Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2026-01-26 17:24 ` [PATCH v1 net] nfc: llcp: Fix memleak in nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame() Simon Horman
2026-01-27 4:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260125010214.1572439-1-kuniyu@google.com \
--to=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=syzbot+f2d245f1d76bbfa50e4c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox