From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BCBA625; Mon, 26 Jan 2026 00:35:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769387712; cv=none; b=puEiRW2aiGHImQhnansa1YQWeYUOKLEL/YVSaUPtndf9UrDK6N8Oa6v17FQyRggcELz7pwinRJDappm0vatIMwXzVN4PYxqwkLEz2TmGV5LQPjDItD0mrwpKu/jxbsM2W0eR73ssIP5laZtgegz7exLmPlEKFIBxhjBx9ZXEoX4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769387712; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UPQoK1ge3az5sWfMSPCewv5xcDr179Pzfg1pOZpPjrk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ji55uSwBHEmtN60mY7VxBu+V6d/JJsRKHA4DBJ6rg3ogUSx+V6CXEIa7nMZO9DLqFZIx1nyUhODO9tAJgq3tH5APIUrMkmT8p54hE05+oVaVGhbQD4QcskjFthDGTsXXy2+DQshTWJhSr3Pw0jF7D7kExtzzqFkOgdkHn/fF/OU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=StN5kJ9Z; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="StN5kJ9Z" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8106CC4CEF1; Mon, 26 Jan 2026 00:35:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1769387712; bh=UPQoK1ge3az5sWfMSPCewv5xcDr179Pzfg1pOZpPjrk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=StN5kJ9Zffbb7bohQyX5TgM0rQPH5yf0P0HPrka2oW8956lqitlziLCBsLVljcF/1 HIH2xlx94WbJRnekZaJiLbC+MbkCS7JSFKg2NXKiyIjZDRqJHNEmnXCIFX91gTqSgj //j7N5aMGBYqgr9aXx9U9b2rKA/85bN6swIZNv4VXIBgDxL9LLI8d3f3OHK+cip7QK YW0z6/9Y+yPRAoOCQ2R0d7OP3LQUP79ZtZPAWAivg5Nc71q5IGJYn91BEoaUmopJGv MCppXfRv4RBZTJBp4wBtsxTsWhYZ+eHfj41f+QsTzbmhvG5wnxxC7YK18GjXT4suvy t+yQFG6W2Lh/g== Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2026 16:35:10 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: David Yang Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Bianconi , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net: airoha: Use u64_stats_t with u64_stats_sync properly Message-ID: <20260125163510.4c5ea4df@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260125220753.3984326-3-mmyangfl@gmail.com> References: <20260125220753.3984326-1-mmyangfl@gmail.com> <20260125220753.3984326-3-mmyangfl@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 06:07:50 +0800 David Yang wrote: > On 64bit arches, struct u64_stats_sync is empty and provides no help > against load/store tearing. Convert to u64_stats_t to ensure atomic > operations. The driver takes a spin lock over the very expensive series of register reads and then drops out to copy the just read values? Just move the readers under the spinlock?