From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE703327C10 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 18:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769539107; cv=none; b=oEF7TvbZIUVEPI4lbMKJzownvXyvMmpKQthiUBHIKDhjBux6VGiPmIVpSI4nZ9f1QQiZANu0B69k5Ihs25JeZCImLvKF+dULlANtQ4KfI83aLJuaRpgwmwBl5crUFO06BxzxQDVuXQz+UmvH1nSm+hs7157EhO95Za8ym3EcQ7I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769539107; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xnxW/CWgie/RiC6ceA36oB6xfFtPTb0OHKlujCG/RnU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=m8qkHu2axHE8jL2u7+G0hSZKIWxeuQ96fuH2Kr1toNbmFO9vsUyo5hjq+3DKPL5GyH5sxQ+hIXM+wfa7e5NRrMp9p7F2G93vZrnuT3chB975e9p5EioO/4YbWpUwVv4ic0bMQ0bP2TULVOg+HXDwP4lcRtmyHuwMic78oqBT0hs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=R5np0NK2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="R5np0NK2" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2020C116C6; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 18:38:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1769539107; bh=xnxW/CWgie/RiC6ceA36oB6xfFtPTb0OHKlujCG/RnU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=R5np0NK2ji0Bvsl4dkcDUf6Xv2tMqnpoJLp4Su5Tlndt1VH/kgo9IUEOMlFv3g9hf NWV0vMSiUt0Ty/+U6OkCTNW7gPzsWU9IOwm4NP/q5gZJ4Esj35k51DOxS3iV4/uDUI r0/gFI1VqGmeoEIcPLpLYMl6CMlt+j3gVMklN0OPTIDr57Yo8dQ/9w49avkrhqjMWe XNqSSCWoK8aqFKZcnqXAHKFmUxbuT0758wx7jjFn63jK8Ko/tcSEWTYyh9Lj4B0l5P lEjH0UyOmDHgFdhCsYpefGH9u4MZh4NhGRVvU6hty2mnsoQtj4rt0oK0ZJsPNFyc0I aQrFGI9h1BMXQ== Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 10:38:25 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, heiko@sntech.de, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, andrew@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com Subject: Re: [net-next,v2,06/22] net: stmmac: rk: add SoC specific ->init() method Message-ID: <20260127103825.7fcc86e3@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260127004020.3785641-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20260127081804.64841f65@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:42:05 +0000 Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > If I'm going to have to split it up just for the sake of reducing the > cost of AI review, Incorrect, as previously stated do not worry about the cost. I was citing the cost as the reason we can't give people open access to the AI bot. > can I ask for a moritorium on other development changes to dwmac-rk > until this is merged? Seems reasonable, as long as you're posting and making active progress we can prioritize merging this work. > As I see it, this is required _because_ of the introduction of AI > review, not because something has actually changed. Can't argue with how you feel. > You have said in the past to me that the 15 patch limit is only > advisory and can be exceeded where it makes sense to, and for this > series, it does make sense. Advisory is too weak. Unless there's a strong reason not to break up the series it should be under 15 patches. This conversation doesn't feel very productive. Let me just apply patches 1-4 and move on :|