From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: rkannoth@marvell.com
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
sbhatta@marvell.com, edumazet@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, sgoutham@marvell.com, sumang@marvell.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next,v5,10/13] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: Allocate MCAM entry for flow installation
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 18:29:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260128022930.4153164-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260126123254.1000480-11-rkannoth@marvell.com>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
---
octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: Allocate MCAM entry for flow installation
This patch extends the install_flow mailbox request message with additional
fields that allow the AF driver to determine the required NPC MCAM entry
type, allocate the MCAM entry, and complete the flow installation in a
single step for CN20K.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_flows.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_flows.c
> index 052d989f2d9a..efd994c65b32 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_flows.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_flows.c
[ ... ]
> +static int otx2_get_kw_type(struct otx2_nic *pfvf,
> + struct npc_install_flow_req *fl_req,
> + u8 *kw_type)
> +{
> + struct npc_get_num_kws_req *req;
> + struct npc_get_num_kws_rsp *rsp;
> + u8 *src, *dst;
> + int off, err;
> + int kw_bits;
> +
> + off = offsetof(struct npc_install_flow_req, packet);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&pfvf->mbox.lock);
> +
> + req = otx2_mbox_alloc_msg_npc_get_num_kws(&pfvf->mbox);
> +
> + dst = (u8 *)&req->fl + off;
^^^
Can this dereference a NULL pointer? otx2_mbox_alloc_msg_* functions can
return NULL on allocation failure, and this line accesses req->fl without
first checking if req is NULL.
Other similar functions in this file (e.g., otx2_mcam_pfl_info_get(),
otx2_get_dft_rl_idx()) properly check for NULL after the mailbox
allocation before using the returned pointer.
> + src = (u8 *)fl_req + off;
> +
> + memcpy(dst, src, sizeof(struct npc_install_flow_req) - off);
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_fs.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_fs.c
> index 963d12ecd328..5fe077935c97 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_fs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_fs.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1759,8 +1857,11 @@ int rvu_mbox_handler_npc_install_flow(struct rvu *rvu,
> enable = true;
>
> /* Do not allow requests from uninitialized VFs */
> - if (from_vf && !enable)
> + if (from_vf && !enable) {
> + rvu_npc_free_entry_for_flow_install(rvu, req->hdr.pcifunc,
> + allocated, req->entry);
> return NPC_FLOW_VF_NOT_INIT;
> + }
>
> /* PF sets VF mac & VF NIXLF is not attached, update the mac addr */
> if (pf_set_vfs_mac && !enable) {
> ether_addr_copy(pfvf->default_mac, req->packet.dmac);
> ether_addr_copy(pfvf->mac_addr, req->packet.dmac);
> set_bit(PF_SET_VF_MAC, &pfvf->flags);
> return 0;
^^^^^^^^^^
Does this path leak the allocated MCAM entry? When rvu_npc_alloc_entry_for_
flow_install() allocates an entry (setting allocated=true), but then this
early return path is taken, rvu_npc_free_entry_for_flow_install() is not
called. All other early return paths in this function properly free the
entry, but this one does not.
> }
>
> mutex_lock(&rswitch->switch_lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-28 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-26 12:32 [PATCH net-next v5 00/13] NPC HW block support for cn20k Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-01-26 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next v5 01/13] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: Index management Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-01-26 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next v5 02/13] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: KPM profile changes Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-01-26 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next v5 03/13] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: Add default profile Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-01-26 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next v5 04/13] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: MKEX profile support Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-01-26 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next v5 05/13] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: Allocate default MCAM indexes Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-01-28 2:29 ` [net-next,v5,05/13] " Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-28 3:29 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-01-29 2:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-26 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next v5 06/13] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: Use common APIs Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-01-28 2:29 ` [net-next,v5,06/13] " Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-28 3:31 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-01-26 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next v5 07/13] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: Prepare for new SoC Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-01-26 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next v5 08/13] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: Add new mailboxes for CN20K silicon Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-01-28 2:29 ` [net-next,v5,08/13] " Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-28 3:31 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-01-26 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next v5 09/13] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: virtual index support Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-01-28 2:29 ` [net-next,v5,09/13] " Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-28 3:35 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-01-26 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next v5 10/13] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: Allocate MCAM entry for flow installation Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-01-28 2:29 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-01-28 3:36 ` [net-next,v5,10/13] " Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-01-26 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next v5 11/13] octeontx2-pf: cn20k: Add TC rules support Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-01-26 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next v5 12/13] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: add debugfs support Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-01-26 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next v5 13/13] octeontx2-af: npc: Use common structures Ratheesh Kannoth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260128022930.4153164-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rkannoth@marvell.com \
--cc=sbhatta@marvell.com \
--cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
--cc=sumang@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox