From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org (mout-p-201.mailbox.org [80.241.56.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E47EA26CE2C; Wed, 28 Jan 2026 22:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.171 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769640472; cv=none; b=o/XL+i3CrR4NBEV82jgeUfCXazQYcuPSjsU3IIWy4BJ0astCo7KDMeYaTVhUIS3jPts8DvNn7r75BwIwdfxCbHuN7xyjM6OhX8w4z1sZGxp7m3bzL+m9w0pJYRmhkfE+g4aq8ejYV2mK/DJntDpyPJa/oJVKzgK5tO0iyfSCaTs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769640472; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ialA5TyIBgxp+uDi4ejZ5ByJ3omyVvwj+aptox/jc5U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dFJSCPgEOXW7q7GIoCsKfZOjzUCH79nmRIxZFG3HoxWndnLvhqBfvv1HZNTblyCvF+FSNIilH8OzEXU1fhzPTnNlOE2gJZp0F1w3+X2P4zV5CWjRuHrM0okj6EVZH4MZiT8lm9+v1xBcru5r9Pz0CeNELRQK4uH3+I6TyokAk/0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=SyOhNsIE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="SyOhNsIE" Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [10.196.197.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4f1cqQ2Kkhz9tgG; Wed, 28 Jan 2026 23:47:46 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1769640466; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=O4upRbVfTJ07DQH6ODb25K7X4KuRaWDl+UDpNd35zMs=; b=SyOhNsIE+x9Koof+yayV9dROTmHkxZR2tmaXFlmoeW44lqFagrJdNkWousn1cicP7XiTHY DawN7wl5LiqsBW7AI9VDIXQGPfHLD75VGtrYTxK4GHSaIscGr7Oc2u6pL2eHuY5pF9atMn TxO+WldlLcQx6UyyJicNCkghMB3b0GmC0f71pRK72knE8HDQQF1hcFodMBMVwoErd2t1GD 4ySioLnGAQcrYpsAfeezykD6ZZykeyhtLymTdatgn3vu2W516EW4EVlmuXZHIBUNLDMwFt A2i27xDC8jmDdSGiW8OyduPz0t+el9ptTDlA2mkwQcHx1amp3Uc3Kwg1jT/lvA== Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 23:47:36 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?xYF1a2Fzeg==?= Majewski To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Jakub Kicinski , festevam@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, horms@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, wahrenst@gmx.net, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, richardcochran@gmail.com, edumazet@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org Subject: Re: [net-next,v20,2/7] net: mtip: The L2 switch driver for imx287 Message-ID: <20260128234736.49bd70b3@wsk> In-Reply-To: References: <20260126103400.1683125-3-lukasz.majewski@mailbox.org> <20260128022549.4151341-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20260128224125.246bcf41@wsk> Organization: mailbox.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MBO-RS-ID: 686151c5d01e846fd34 X-MBO-RS-META: 5xys9hdxh1j3adjqtyn71d9ygs5oeaky Hi Andrew, > On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:41:25PM +0100, =C5=81ukasz Majewski wrote: > > Hi Jakub, > > =20 > > > This is an AI-generated review =20 > >=20 > > AI is going to take the "Maintainer's" job :D =20 >=20 > We had a bit of a discussion about this. >=20 > Our observations so far is that AI finds different sorts of issues, > which human reviewer often don't spot. It also does get things wrong, > so we spend some time sanity checking its reports. So overall, it > might actually increase the workload, but also increase the quality of > the code which gets committed. >=20 Frankly - from the MTIP L2 switch patch set review - the AI review does a _really_ good job ... It finds non trivial issues - with very deep insights to function's call dependencies. > Andrew --=20 Best regards, =C5=81ukasz Majewski