From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6339032ED43 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2026 15:29:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769700566; cv=none; b=CxMcJEBvkDteMamMCGYmBUknGCCHioOp5FVFV4KQvw8FtL9M7R5P9F9N2EP6PPzu+45ji/ZvJX1ja6ivvVApgujziwB/XGQtA1VCcDOF+9ZLqDPskouJgpd42Pes9MEpb2SUNIuDiDNNmbOq8ko9uOTGClpwPG3O/jAfJbMNvVg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769700566; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1xbevfEFLMw6cxLSTvnpNWu1vvnf1bRZMX1cid9N778=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dXMTIPufN2GI5XioVPcz7HUYjVyAeeMhJPfXRm3u1M3cJx9nAkQoPNFoWuH3Z5GtbmljYLvfTAyW1Ep5PzEMLRUgHyFjNppewsSJ4ap1nh2ZNpE0Fi7EDF097nV2PT1EyhVBhA+ePR9XhFtLASH60vm+9ux0vYOAnh64MaRa9e8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=tuEDeIQr; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=GHNAYGdA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="tuEDeIQr"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="GHNAYGdA" Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 16:29:22 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1769700563; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dHdep/or8hrGdYdzJ64DA7zDDlSnl955IPWsfg+rGAM=; b=tuEDeIQrrvqVjhN6qMt7aGkFn6LuJSBrq17HUdalxvXOvPPpv8enzwTGzKnrTQR/Oc9ZP3 bKJB8vT2/S7x3KiJpnL7gyCWJ61fMvZsPICevtLu6jfZRCkGEcap+OqbFlqhfdYMww5q+e HjE8ysZpy8UPr0U/frkIxt0Yu+9TJB1tn+Z6G+JSagH5dla5nDxJrV0sV2Xckze9MTZQP9 TkV79IK08z/lF+IVXVDvkKu7B/bWnqQgcbEC6Q3Fse3SJRAnyrFIPmi63MWmtlElPqK1Ac kcSs0MlzbXjHChvngr+aAP7aH3DiBkAOt66C/681F8sTS9UAGdPqBjtGA8zToA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1769700563; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dHdep/or8hrGdYdzJ64DA7zDDlSnl955IPWsfg+rGAM=; b=GHNAYGdAZGwaxnbSkXWLisj4o9fmTx+j1h1zKL6S5014t0LlaOs7/Ok4/mHskzdvqYDFSV pRxXo+wW6hEY+3AA== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Felix Maurer Cc: Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, jkarrenpalo@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, allison.henderson@oracle.com, petrm@nvidia.com, antonio@openvpn.net Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] hsr: Implement more robust duplicate discard algorithm Message-ID: <20260129152922.P0efzzu6@linutronix.de> References: <20260122173556.44d8b77f@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On 2026-01-26 10:28:18 [+0100], Felix Maurer wrote: > > I'll wait for feedback from Sebastian, but I'm also fine with merging > the fixes for the KUnit test into the other patches and reposting. Overall the new algorithm is very nice. Feel free to add Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior I made a few comments where I think it should be possible to avoid tracking the sequence number for interface A and B but since you preserve what is done now, I don't mind to keep it as-it and try to remove it later on (unless I'm wrong and it is not doable). > Thanks, > Felix Sebastian