From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB58727AC48 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2026 01:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769822013; cv=none; b=X4oqYqo5kxDBL86WbHoMReRK6UNhJ1UTpG9o3s9QbltwjO1Ab7Tzs1fDYiT6Z205GmLtQGwasznQcfrnLEJjY77utOEFb3TIxXfQ3YsB6uW2XESy7oo+jPV4nfWHcT+W3IPZHf4rt09iUcDEm9e4JRm64TUTMVZSkqYG6ntdVwM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769822013; c=relaxed/simple; bh=evgtStCu75itte8DFZOCQRwGzrdulcJ0CsxFLzCzYuY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BMnc8nQjAhn29Kv6llKDntkq3RwZ/h94BkBakjJhuwzCaYnNhNzVGsALwxlaoKylgzhjkUVeom74/lUNfmQZ1QCYElpWCcCSwu7VBDUBMRWv0mDMzm8u9L3Pku1kIR1uJbW1MxzaRm+h7ayV7c1iBbW3mLJETZ0umGvwD0hXO0E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IId1qtpG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IId1qtpG" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E022C4CEF7; Sat, 31 Jan 2026 01:13:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1769822012; bh=evgtStCu75itte8DFZOCQRwGzrdulcJ0CsxFLzCzYuY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IId1qtpGfJn7lUn8mfTX7RHbRzYOksTBfxDGw8RHZzVV59hgsML5Eykkv+SztIIay Kn1MWLOx7LSN+ax6GmnaTPuVCusOIjvrUiZz3w45YI9TRKju8J89xo4AszMfXgq9tD b+5pFQu3DLnYJ+GhW3SxCbcpuEuMxmbXzh57ToTcqg5ZrCgT2macvFR89CN9DUdWmK W9HHSjGsyfFa9p/YksjAEwRQ74wvTwUdCTERjPmM1a+uQnnvHqouX3BCOAeMDZ4yI+ E1ZwHsYgvESEs6wCfuTNYLlT80q+MGj5nYcL1EKtoJWA3NZKs7TZSmFkW+hYMgnmvo 9VWbkrnItSUyw== Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 17:13:31 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: ALOK TIWARI Cc: Bhargava Chenna Marreddy , Vikas Gupta , rajashekar.hudumula@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bng_en: fix misleading error message for generic firmware version Message-ID: <20260130171331.70172109@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260130073055.1609162-1-alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 19:10:13 +0530 ALOK TIWARI wrote: > >> ACK. will send v2. =20 > > Should this be a candidate for net with a Fixes tag? =20 >=20 > I am open to either approach. It does not break functionality, but the=20 > current message can be misleading so I am happy to tag it for net if you= =20 > think it=E2=80=99s appropriate. I think net-next is perfectly fine here