From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, memxor@gmail.com,
martin.lau@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, haoluo@google.com,
ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 02/16] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink_map to failable
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 21:09:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260131050920.2574084-3-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260131050920.2574084-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>
To prepare for changing bpf_local_storage_map_bucket::lock to rqspinlock,
convert bpf_selem_unlink_map() to failable. It still always succeeds and
returns 0 for now.
Since some operations updating local storage cannot fail in the middle,
open-code bpf_selem_unlink_map() to take the b->lock before the
operation. There are two such locations:
- bpf_local_storage_alloc()
The first selem will be unlinked from smap if cmpxchg owner_storage_ptr
fails, which should not fail. Therefore, hold b->lock when linking
until allocation complete. Helpers that assume b->lock is held by
callers are introduced: bpf_selem_link_map_nolock() and
bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock().
- bpf_local_storage_update()
The three step update process: link_map(new_selem),
link_storage(new_selem), and unlink_map(old_selem) should not fail in
the middle.
In bpf_selem_unlink(), bpf_selem_unlink_map() and
bpf_selem_unlink_storage() should either all succeed or fail as a whole
instead of failing in the middle. So, return if unlink_map() failed.
Remove the selem_linked_to_map_lockless() check as an selem in the
commom paths (not bpf_local_storage_map_free() or
bpf_local_storage_destroy()), will be unlinked under b->lock and
local_storage->lock and therefore no other threads can unlink the selem
from map at the same time.
In bpf_local_storage_destroy(), ignore the return of
bpf_selem_unlink_map() for now. A later patch will allow
bpf_local_storage_destroy() to unlink selems even when failing to
acquire locks.
Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
index 6615091dd0e5..1916ea2aee4b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
@@ -61,11 +61,6 @@ static bool selem_linked_to_storage(const struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
return !hlist_unhashed(&selem->snode);
}
-static bool selem_linked_to_map_lockless(const struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
-{
- return !hlist_unhashed_lockless(&selem->map_node);
-}
-
static bool selem_linked_to_map(const struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
{
return !hlist_unhashed(&selem->map_node);
@@ -347,25 +342,28 @@ void bpf_selem_link_storage_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage,
hlist_add_head_rcu(&selem->snode, &local_storage->list);
}
-static void bpf_selem_unlink_map(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
+/* Only called in common paths */
+static int bpf_selem_unlink_map(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
{
struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage;
struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap;
struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b;
unsigned long flags;
- if (unlikely(!selem_linked_to_map_lockless(selem)))
- /* selem has already be unlinked from smap */
- return;
-
local_storage = rcu_dereference_check(selem->local_storage,
bpf_rcu_lock_held());
smap = rcu_dereference_check(SDATA(selem)->smap, bpf_rcu_lock_held());
b = select_bucket(smap, local_storage);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&b->lock, flags);
- if (likely(selem_linked_to_map(selem)))
- hlist_del_init_rcu(&selem->map_node);
+ hlist_del_init_rcu(&selem->map_node);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
+{
+ hlist_del_init_rcu(&selem->map_node);
}
void bpf_selem_link_map(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
@@ -383,13 +381,24 @@ void bpf_selem_link_map(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
}
+static void bpf_selem_link_map_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b,
+ struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
+{
+ hlist_add_head_rcu(&selem->map_node, &b->list);
+}
+
void bpf_selem_unlink(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem, bool reuse_now)
{
+ int err;
+
/* Always unlink from map before unlinking from local_storage
* because selem will be freed after successfully unlinked from
* the local_storage.
*/
- bpf_selem_unlink_map(selem);
+ err = bpf_selem_unlink_map(selem);
+ if (err)
+ return;
+
bpf_selem_unlink_storage(selem, reuse_now);
}
@@ -431,6 +440,8 @@ int bpf_local_storage_alloc(void *owner,
{
struct bpf_local_storage *prev_storage, *storage;
struct bpf_local_storage **owner_storage_ptr;
+ struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b;
+ unsigned long flags;
int err;
err = mem_charge(smap, owner, sizeof(*storage));
@@ -455,7 +466,10 @@ int bpf_local_storage_alloc(void *owner,
storage->use_kmalloc_nolock = smap->use_kmalloc_nolock;
bpf_selem_link_storage_nolock(storage, first_selem);
- bpf_selem_link_map(smap, first_selem);
+
+ b = select_bucket(smap, storage);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&b->lock, flags);
+ bpf_selem_link_map_nolock(b, first_selem);
owner_storage_ptr =
(struct bpf_local_storage **)owner_storage(smap, owner);
@@ -471,10 +485,12 @@ int bpf_local_storage_alloc(void *owner,
*/
prev_storage = cmpxchg(owner_storage_ptr, NULL, storage);
if (unlikely(prev_storage)) {
- bpf_selem_unlink_map(first_selem);
+ bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock(first_selem);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
err = -EAGAIN;
goto uncharge;
}
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
return 0;
@@ -496,8 +512,9 @@ bpf_local_storage_update(void *owner, struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
struct bpf_local_storage_data *old_sdata = NULL;
struct bpf_local_storage_elem *alloc_selem, *selem = NULL;
struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage;
+ struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b;
HLIST_HEAD(old_selem_free_list);
- unsigned long flags;
+ unsigned long flags, b_flags;
int err;
/* BPF_EXIST and BPF_NOEXIST cannot be both set */
@@ -581,20 +598,25 @@ bpf_local_storage_update(void *owner, struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
goto unlock;
}
+ b = select_bucket(smap, local_storage);
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&b->lock, b_flags);
+
alloc_selem = NULL;
/* First, link the new selem to the map */
- bpf_selem_link_map(smap, selem);
+ bpf_selem_link_map_nolock(b, selem);
/* Second, link (and publish) the new selem to local_storage */
bpf_selem_link_storage_nolock(local_storage, selem);
/* Third, remove old selem, SELEM(old_sdata) */
if (old_sdata) {
- bpf_selem_unlink_map(SELEM(old_sdata));
+ bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock(SELEM(old_sdata));
bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock(local_storage, SELEM(old_sdata),
&old_selem_free_list);
}
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, b_flags);
unlock:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&local_storage->lock, flags);
bpf_selem_free_list(&old_selem_free_list, false);
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-31 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-31 5:09 [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/16] Remove task and cgroup local storage percpu counters Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 01/16] bpf: Select bpf_local_storage_map_bucket based on bpf_local_storage Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-31 18:40 ` Amery Hung
2026-01-31 19:13 ` Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:09 ` Amery Hung [this message]
2026-01-31 5:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 02/16] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink_map to failable bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-31 18:40 ` Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/16] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_link_map " Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-31 18:43 ` Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/16] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink " Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 05/16] bpf: Change local_storage->lock and b->lock to rqspinlock Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-31 18:46 ` Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 06/16] bpf: Remove task local storage percpu counter Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/16] bpf: Remove cgroup " Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 08/16] bpf: Remove unused percpu counter from bpf_local_storage_map_free Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 09/16] bpf: Prepare for bpf_selem_unlink_nofail() Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 10/16] bpf: Support lockless unlink when freeing map or local storage Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 11/16] bpf: Switch to bpf_selem_unlink_nofail in bpf_local_storage_{map_free, destroy} Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 12/16] selftests/bpf: Update sk_storage_omem_uncharge test Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 13/16] selftests/bpf: Update task_local_storage/recursion test Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-31 18:49 ` Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 14/16] selftests/bpf: Update task_local_storage/task_storage_nodeadlock test Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-31 18:47 ` Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 15/16] selftests/bpf: Remove test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup Amery Hung
2026-01-31 5:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 16/16] selftests/bpf: Choose another percpu variable in bpf for btf_dump test Amery Hung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260131050920.2574084-3-ameryhung@gmail.com \
--to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox