From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 964BD3EBF1F; Sun, 1 Feb 2026 00:45:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769906719; cv=none; b=OlNwRV7bBYQPxhvxF+DVgdiw3CmZkTq2VQwCZgUBMTymfGI7cXXTT4cAhj9CN8cmytc5vpIQPwnhhHFnMEoMWo2M/YFBwWFmS8s7QENJcZ2s5s35fpj3EAJlgyP0MKxGqff26FjnYMxjMFUxK5hdnC9mh17nqhWc/4+Lo7PB9ZA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769906719; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3H50njZHf/MxF1LMF+V5Pv639i4KiMLWrfP4zBIYZyI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XFSlELtCOYrfIVXq1ybsR55Zi0wfEEaM8bBuKqp/yfx04GDMqKCoTpEmyvp4D3IRcYjOWQrmX9vURq0a4X7my5A3cMHjVX3In5SGh/VkOF1a6QjO9q+lHfvFnYtzMKbuL/9PyL1xmOtcIsmX693ppHyRdyRX7kzW0ES+Y3sS4Wg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=S7bY3VXT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="S7bY3VXT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 165EBC4CEF1; Sun, 1 Feb 2026 00:45:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1769906719; bh=3H50njZHf/MxF1LMF+V5Pv639i4KiMLWrfP4zBIYZyI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=S7bY3VXTi93jajlzzf9u55uwY1CbLXh0X1C+sbA+21hInHUw0Fpej/aYRhSU3/jXh nBooIc/RlWsgFA/cGDkdsLhGmVYdaNWGpjHaWxhjtx4sMbsZcqB5HAQtYYHzIOJdhm lrkfaUHOyP5Vf6mqT/2D3UFb/0eGVCbrSV9yENRYzeN5a5FEJpzGjms7dHoravUEi/ B05bkLXi+uGuGGJ5x1xp8hbG3dZFgWdNAsgNoCWEHTs7/m/EsK03somqEOGxIrna83 xZHPgiuGZS5Wd8T2nPL9S3XufRfuaV1SRvpVzRDh0v0lK25et8Bkl0zgfD/id0oj3/ TSKJyytk0CGZQ== Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 16:45:16 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com Cc: tariqt@nvidia.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, shaojijie@huawei.com, shenjian15@huawei.com, salil.mehta@huawei.com, mbloch@nvidia.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, leon@kernel.org, eperezma@redhat.com, brett.creeley@amd.com, jasowang@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, mst@redhat.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, parav@nvidia.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, horms@kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org, kuniyu@google.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dave.taht@gmail.com, jhs@mojatatu.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us, davem@davemloft.net, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, donald.hunter@gmail.com, ast@fiberby.net, liuhangbin@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, ij@kernel.org, ncardwell@google.com, koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com, g.white@cablelabs.com, ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com, mirja.kuehlewind@ericsson.com, cheshire@apple.com, rs.ietf@gmx.at, Jason_Livingood@comcast.com, vidhi_goel@apple.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 0/3] ECN offload handling for AccECN series Message-ID: <20260131164516.4a423230@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260131225510.2946-1-chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com> References: <20260131225510.2946-1-chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 31 Jan 2026 23:55:07 +0100 chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com wrote: > --- > v2: > - Replace VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN with VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN_FLAGS For the future: Quoting documentation: Limit patches outstanding on mailing list ----------------------------------------- Avoid having more than 15 patches, across all series, outstanding for review on the mailing list for a single tree. In other words, a maximum of 15 patches under review on net, and a maximum of 15 patches under review on net-next. This limit is intended to focus developer effort on testing patches before upstream review. Aiding the quality of upstream submissions, and easing the load on reviewers. See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#limit-patches-outstanding-on-mailing-list